- Bar-Hillel M (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica. 44(3):211-233.
- Di Bello M (2019). Trial by statistics: Is a high probability of guilt enough to convict?. Mind. 128(512):1045-1084.
- Di Bello M (2020). Proof paradoxes and normic support: Socializing or relativizing?. Mind. 129(516):1269-1285.
- Duff RA, Farmer L, Marshall S, Tadros V (2007). The trial on trial (Volume 3): Towards a normative theory of the criminal trial. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Gardiner G (2018). Legal burdens of proof and statistical evidence. In: Coady D, Chase J, editors. Routledge handbook of applied epistemology. New York: Routledge.
- Hamer D (2004). Probabilistic standards of proof, their complements and the errors that are expected to flow from them. University of New England Law Journal. 1(1):71-107.
- Moss S (2016). Probabilistic knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Nesson CR (1979). Reasonable doubt and permissive inferences: The value of complexity. Harvard Law Review. 92(6):1187-1225.
- Pollock JL (2001). Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artificial Intelligence. 133(1-2):233-282.
- Redmayne M (2008). Exploring the proof paradoxes. Legal Theory. 14(4):281-309.
- Roth AL (2010). Safety in numbers? Deciding when DNA alone is enough to convict. New York University Law Review. 85(4).
- Schoeman F (1987). Statistical vs. direct evidence. Noûs. 21(2):179-198.
- Smith M (2018). When does evidence suffice for conviction?. Mind. 127(508):1193-1218.
- Thomson JJ (1986). Liability and individualized evidence. Law and Contemporary Problems. 49(3):199-219.
- Wells GL (1992). Naked statistical evidence of liability: Is subjective probability enough?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 62(5): 739-752.
- Williams G (1979a). The mathematics of proof-1. Criminal Law Review. p. 297-308.
- Williams G (1979b). The mathematics of proof-2. Criminal Law Review. p. 340-354.
- Zabell SL (2005). Fingerprint evidence. Journal of Law and Policy. 13(1):143-179.
