Tarbiat Modares University (TMU) Philosophical Thought 1973-2873 2 1 2022 03 11 Argument of Matter and Form on the Unity of the Reasoner and Reasonable and the Analysis of the Suspicion of Allegory and Confiscation Argument of Matter and Form on the Unity of the Reasoner and Reasonable and the Analysis of the Suspicion of Allegory and Confiscation 37 50 23061 10.58209/jpt.2.1.37 FA M.R. Ershadinia Department of Islamic Philosophy & Wisdom, Faculty of Teology, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran Journal Article 2021 11 22 One of Hakim Sabzevari's arguments on the reasoner and reasonable union of "matter and form" is the argument, in which he considers the ontological principles of matter, form, and soul on the one hand, and on the other hand, he has put the view of Sadra's psychology as the basis for the completion of this argument. In order to distort all the arguments of Hakim Sabzevari, a published article accusing Hakim of "gross confusion" in recognizing the basic contents of philosophy. In this regard, in refuting the argument of matter and form, that article has turned to two major accusations. On the one hand, Hakim has been accused of using allegorical syllogism instead of argumentative syllogism, and on the other hand, it has condemned Hakim for the objection of confiscation. The analysis shows that this argument is based on total unity and that article has been distorted both in terms of reporting and in judgment, it has deviated to adopt illogical positions. One of Hakim Sabzevari's arguments on the reasoner and reasonable union of "matter and form" is the argument, in which he considers the ontological principles of matter, form, and soul on the one hand, and on the other hand, he has put the view of Sadra's psychology as the basis for the completion of this argument. In order to distort all the arguments of Hakim Sabzevari, a published article accusing Hakim of "gross confusion" in recognizing the basic contents of philosophy. In this regard, in refuting the argument of matter and form, that article has turned to two major accusations. On the one hand, Hakim has been accused of using allegorical syllogism instead of argumentative syllogism, and on the other hand, it has condemned Hakim for the objection of confiscation. The analysis shows that this argument is based on total unity and that article has been distorted both in terms of reporting and in judgment, it has deviated to adopt illogical positions. https://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article_23061_186b9c4e15d0dfece1765c0a5cfb8e33.pdf