Tarbiat Modares University (TMU) Philosophical Thought 1973-2873 4 1 2024 06 30 Analyzing the Idea of "Verbal Sharing of Existence" from the Perspective of Hakim Rajab-Ali Tabrizi and Examining his Conflict with Mulla Sadra on This Issue Analyzing the Idea of "Verbal Sharing of Existence" from the Perspective of Hakim Rajab-Ali Tabrizi and Examining his Conflict with Mulla Sadra on This Issue 71 89 23111 10.58209/jpt.4.1.71 FA S. Anvari Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba’I University, Tehran, Iran M. Hedayat Afza Department of Philosophy and Kalam, Theology Faculty, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran Journal Article 2024 02 13 Mullah Rajab Ali Tabrizi is one of the philosophers concerned about the issue of "verbal or spiritual sharing of the concept of existence". While referring to some of the predecessors' opinions, Tabrizi is based on some ontological foundations. From an epistemological point of view, Tabrizi believed in a close relationship between concepts and examples. Therefore, one cannot expect such a realist thinker to rule on a concept such as existence, regardless of its examples. Also, Tabrizi's disbelief in credit concepts in philosophy aligns with his opinion on the verbal sharing of existence. Contrary to Khatunabadi's theory, this point was not the main reason for Hakim's tendency towards the idea of verbal sharing; Rather, Tabrizi's main addressee in this matter is Mulla-Sadra, who has a special understanding of verbal sharing and based on it, he puts forward the challenging idea of doubting the truth of existence, which Tabrizi does not accept.<br><br><br><br> Mullah Rajab Ali Tabrizi is one of the philosophers concerned about the issue of "verbal or spiritual sharing of the concept of existence". While referring to some of the predecessors' opinions, Tabrizi is based on some ontological foundations. From an epistemological point of view, Tabrizi believed in a close relationship between concepts and examples. Therefore, one cannot expect such a realist thinker to rule on a concept such as existence, regardless of its examples. Also, Tabrizi's disbelief in credit concepts in philosophy aligns with his opinion on the verbal sharing of existence. Contrary to Khatunabadi's theory, this point was not the main reason for Hakim's tendency towards the idea of verbal sharing; Rather, Tabrizi's main addressee in this matter is Mulla-Sadra, who has a special understanding of verbal sharing and based on it, he puts forward the challenging idea of doubting the truth of existence, which Tabrizi does not accept.<br><br><br><br> https://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article_23111_7ffd8e40d538d8b30ce61cbabff98065.pdf