Volume 2, Issue 4 (2022)
jpt 2022, 2(4): 283-296 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hosseinpour G. The Critique of Two Approaches in Linguistics Based on the Theory of Speech Acts. jpt 2022; 2 (4) :283-296
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-65048-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-65048-en.html
Islamic Mysticism Department, Research Institute of Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution, Tehran, Iran , reza_hossein_pour@yahoo.com
Abstract: (975 Views)
The performative deletion analysis approach, does not assume the presence of speakers, hearers, and verbs, but rather the presence of the words "I", "you", and performative verbs. In the approach of conversational postulates, it is also possible to formalize principles of conversation and show that there are rules in grammar that are dependent on such principles. But according to John Searle, both approaches to the performative deletion analysis and the conversational postulates show a misunderstanding of the place of theory of speech acts in the general narrative of language. Searle's objection to these two approaches is that they both fail to use the sources of current theories of speech acts. Both theories, when confronted with confusing data, assume a solution that requires the introduction of additional and unnecessary components. In each, a correct understanding of the role of speech acts enables us to justify this data without providing these additional and unnecessary components.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Philosophy of Language (Analytical)
Received: 2022/08/26 | Accepted: 2022/11/10 | Published: 2022/12/18
Received: 2022/08/26 | Accepted: 2022/11/10 | Published: 2022/12/18
References
1. Audi R (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link]
2. Austin JL (1962). How to do things with words, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Link]
3. Cordon, D, Lakoff G (1971). Conversational Postulates. Speech Acts. 3: 83-106. [Link] [DOI:10.1163/9789004368811_005]
4. Heal J (1977). Ross and Lakoff on Declarative Sentences. Studies in Language. 1(3):337-362. [Link] [DOI:10.1075/sl.1.3.03hea]
5. Keenan EO (1976). The Universality of Conversational Postulates. Language in Society. 5:67-80. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S0047404500006850]
6. Morgan JL (1977). Conversational Postulates Revisited. Language. 53(2):277-284. [Link] [DOI:10.1353/lan.1977.0027]
7. Ross J (1970). On Declarative Sentences. Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Jacobs RA , Rosenbaum PS (eds.). Massachusetts: Ginn and Company. [Link]
8. Searle J (2001). JL Austin. In Martinich AP, Sosa D (eds). A Companion to Analytic Phlosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. [Link]
9. Searle JR (1979). Expression and Meaning; Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511609213]
10. Searle JR (1969). Speech Acts, An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139173438]
11. Soames S (2003). Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, vol. 2. Oxford: Princeton University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1515/9781400825806]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |