Volume 2, Issue 4 (2022)
jpt 2022, 2(4): 311-324 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sadeghi R. Originality of Existence as a Criterion of Moral Goodness in Sadra's Philosophy. jpt 2022; 2 (4) :311-324
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-65210-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-65210-en.html
Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran , rezasadeqi@gmail.com
Abstract: (1056 Views)
In Sadra's philosophy, existence is introduced as good, and levels of existence are also levels of goodness. He in his Ethics believes in intrinsic and rational goodness and ugliness. In this article, we will discuss the relationship between these two parts of Sadra's thought and we will show that Originality of existence can be a rational basis for defending inherent goodness and ugliness. The main claim is that the originality of existence and levels of existence also have normative dimensions. In the following, Sadra's ethics will be compared with the view of his two contemporary philosophers and it will be argued that Sadra's moral system is opposed to Cartesian voluntarism because he defends moral goodness by relying on intellect and does not consider moral rules to be subject to human will. Also, his realistic ethics is different from empirical utilitarianism and because he accepts the relation between existence and goodness, his ethics is a practical obstacle against meaninglessness and nihilism.
Keywords: originality of existence, intellectual goodness and ugliness, intrinsic goodness and ugliness, voluntarism, moral relativism
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Philosophy of Ethics (Islamic)
Received: 2022/10/5 | Accepted: 2022/12/27 | Published: 2023/03/1
Received: 2022/10/5 | Accepted: 2022/12/27 | Published: 2023/03/1
References
1. Ashtiani MM (1973). Commentary on the interpretation of the System (Volume 1). Tehran: Moaseseye Motaleate Eslami. [Arabic] [Link]
2. Bennett J (1994) Descartes's theory of modality. The Philosophical Review. 103(4):639-667. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/2186100]
3. Curley EM (1984). Descartes on the creation of the eternal truths. The Philosophical Review. 93(4):569-597. [DOI:10.2307/2184828]
4. Hobbes T (1904). Leviathan: The matter, forme and power of a commonwealth, ecclesiasticall and civil. London: Cambridge University Press. [Link]
5. Hume D (2016). Exploring the fundamentals of ethics. Mardiha M, translator. Tehran: Minavi Kherad Publications. [Persian] [Link]
6. Mulla Sadra (1981). AL-SHAWAHID AL-RUBUBIYYAH. Tehran: University Publication Center. [Arabic] [Link]
7. Mulla Sadra (1989a). The transcendent wisdom in the four mental journeys (Volume 1). Qom: Nashre Mostafa. [Arabic] [Link]
8. Mulla Sadra (1989b). The transcendent wisdom in the four mental journeys (Volume 2). Qom: Nashre Mostafa. [Arabic] [Link]
9. Mulla Sadra (1989c). The transcendent wisdom in the four mental journeys (Volume 5). Qom: Nashre Mostafa. [Arabic] [Link]
10. Mulla Sadra (1989d). The transcendent wisdom in the four mental journeys (Volume 6). Qom: Nashre Mostafa. [Arabic] [Link]
11. Mulla Sadra (1989e). The transcendent wisdom in the four mental journeys (Volume 7). Qom: Nashre Mostafa. [Arabic] [Link]
12. Muzaffar MR (1992). Principles of jurisprudence (Volume 1). Qom: Teachers Association Publications. [Arabic] [Link]
13. Nadler S (2006). Spinoza's Ethics an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511815737]
14. Plato (2010). Collection of works (Volume 1). Lotfi H, translator. Tehran: Kharazmi Publishing. [Persian] [Link]
15. Sabzevari MH (1995). Interpretation of the System (Volume 2). Tehran: Naab Publishing. [Persian] [Link]
16. Spinoza B (1989). Ethica. Saadat E, translator. Tehran: University Publication Center. [Persian] [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |