Volume 3, Issue 2 (2023)
jpt 2023, 3(2): 101-119 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
RahimNasirian I, Hesamifar A. Rorty vs. Davidson; a Semantic Theory Based on Truth. jpt 2023; 3 (2) :101-119
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-66461-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-66461-en.html
1- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
Abstract: (392 Views)
An example of Rorty's confrontation with the analytical philosophy is his opposition to Davidson's attempt to propose a semantic theory based on truth. According to an anti-metaphysical approach to Truth, Rorty believes that the use of the phrase "p is true" is simply to confirm a claim that we consider ourselves or others justified in making. Although Davidson is against the metaphysical approach to truth, based on a Tarskian truth definition, he believes that a notion of truth more robust than Rorty will admit is required to propose a theory about meaning. Rorty's Wittgensteinian response to Davidson is that not only the conversation between the speaker and the interpreter is not conditional on knowing a theory of meaning based on truth, but the attempt to say something more than what we can say about truth leads us to the confusions of the metaphysical tradition. This article, referring to Davidson's writings, shows that Davidson's effort to propose a semantic theory based on truth inevitably leads him to express metaphysical interpretations.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Philosophy of Language (Modern)
Received: 2022/12/31 | Accepted: 2023/05/20 | Published: 2023/06/5
Received: 2022/12/31 | Accepted: 2023/05/20 | Published: 2023/06/5
References
1. Brandom R B (2000). Introduction. Brandom RB editor. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. [Link]
2. Davidson D (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Link]
3. Davidson D (1986). A nice derangement of epitaphs. LePore E editor. Truth and interpretation, perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson. New York: Basil Blackwell Publishers. p. 433-446. [Link]
4. Davidson D (1990). The structure and content of truth. The Journal of Philosophy. 87(6):279-328. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/2026863]
5. Davidson D (1996). The folly of trying to define truth. The Journal of Philosophy. 93(6):263-278. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/2941075]
6. Davidson D (2000). Truth Rehabilitated. Brandom RB editor. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. 65-74. [Link]
7. Davidson D (2001). Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/0198237537.001.0001]
8. Engel P (2002). Truth (Central Problems of Philosophy). Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. [Link]
9. Habermas J (2000). Richard Rorty's pragmatic turn. Brandom RB editor. Rorty and his critics. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. p. 31-55. [Link]
10. Pollard D (2008). Davidson, Donald Herbert. Brown S, Collinson D, Wilkinson R editors. One hundred twentieth-century philosophers. New York: Routledge Publisher. p. 41-43. [Link]
11. Mason R (2008). Wittgenstein, Ludwig Josef Johann. Brown S, Collinson D, Wilkinson R editors. One hundred twentieth-century philosophers. New York: Routledge Publisher. p. 201-205. [Link]
12. RahimNasirian I, Hesamifar A, Seyf M, Heydari M (2022). Rorty versus Habermas, a pragmatic turn toward truth and its applicability in organizing justification relations. Journal of Philosophical Investigations. 16(40):378-394. [Persian] [Link]
13. Rorty R (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139173643]
14. Rorty R (1995). Is truth a goal of inquiry? Davidson Vs. Wright. The Philosophical Quarterly. 45(180):281-300. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/2219651]
15. Rorty R (1996). Something to steer by. London Review of Book (LRB). 18(12):1-8. [Link]
16. Rorty R (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin Books Publishing. [Link]
17. Rorty R (2000a). Response to Davidson. Brandom RB editor. Rorty and His Critics. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. p. 74-80. [Link]
18. Rorty R (2000b). Universality and Truth. Brandom RB editor. Rorty and His Critics. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. p. 1-30. [Link]
19. Tarski A (1994). The semantic conception of truth: and the foundations of semantic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 4(3):341-376. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/2102968]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |