Volume 1, Issue 1 (2021)                   jpt 2021, 1(1): 61-77 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Farsian K, Hodjati S. Graham Priest on Reconstruction of Hegel’s Logic and Metaphysics in Modern Logic. jpt. 2021; 1 (1) :61-77
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-45297-en.html
1- Deptartment of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Deptartment of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , hojatima@modares.ac.ir
Abstract:   (936 Views)
In this paper, we will try to reconstruct Hegel’s logic and metaphysics through modern logic. Graham Priest has claimed that we can read Hegel’s logic with the paraconsistent approach to logic, specially Dialetheism; he calls Hegel a Dialetheist. At first, we report Priest’s account of Hegel’s dialectic and his notion of dialectical contradiction; also, we try to analyze Priest’s argument for calling Hegel a Dialetheist. To achieve the proper comparison between Hegel’s logic and Dialetic one, we explain, non-technically, the simple semantics of a Dialetic logic. Furthermore, finally, we establish a criticism of Priest’s account to reopen the question about Hegel’s being Dialetheist.
Full-Text [PDF 637 kb]   (161 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Logic and Philosophy of Logic (Analytical)
Received: 2020/08/18 | Accepted: 2020/11/24 | Published: 2021/03/14
* Corresponding Author Address: Dept. of Philosophy, Tarbiat Modares University, Gisha Bridge, Tehran, Iran Postal code: 1411713116

References
1. Bordignon M (2019). Hegel: A Dialetheist? Truth and contradiction in Hegel's logic. Hegel Bulletin. 40(2);198-214. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/hgl.2017.15]
2. Edwards P (1967). The encyclopedia of philosophy. 34th Volume. Unknown city: Macmillan. pp. 449-451. [Link]
3. Hegel GWF (1896). Lectures on the history of philosophy. Volume III. Sanderson Haldane E, Simson FH, translators. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trübner, & Company, Limited. [Link]
4. Hegel GWF (1991). The encyclopedia logic [EL]. Geraets TF, Suchting WA, Harris HS, translators. Indianapolis: Hackett publishing company. [Link]
5. Houlgate S (2016). Hegel, Kant and the antinomies of pure reason. Kant Yearbook. 8(1):39-62. [Link]
6. Popper K (1940). What is Dialectic? Mind. 49:403-426. [Link]
7. Priest G (1979). The logic of Paradoxes. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 8:219-241. [Link]
8. Priest G (1989). Dialectic and dialetheic. Science & Society. 53:388-415. [Link]
9. Priest G, Routley R (1984). Introduction: Paraconsistent logics. Studia Logica. 43:3-16. [Link]
10. Priest G (2006). In contradiction. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263301.001.0001]
11. Taylor C (1975). Hegel. London: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139171465]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author