Volume 3, Issue 1 (2023)
jpt 2023, 3(1): 33-45 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ainechi R, Khandaqi J. Comparison of the Concept of Perfection in the Definition of Beauty from the Perspective of Avicenna and Aquinas. jpt 2023; 3 (1) :33-45
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-64869-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-64869-en.html
1- Department of Art Research, Faculty of Arts, Ferdows Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Dramatic Literature, Faculty of Arts, Ferdows Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Dramatic Literature, Faculty of Arts, Ferdows Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract: (1433 Views)
Defining beauty is one of the most critical issues in philosophical aesthetics. Walking philosophers have brought or referred to the concept of "perfection" as one of the main elements of the definition of beauty. After explaining the views of Avicenna and Aquinas in this field, this research deals with the question of what is the place of the concept of perfection in the definition of the beauty of both of them. This research is descriptive-analytical. In the collection, it uses the library method, and in the analysis, it uses the qualitative method. The results of this research show that beauty is essential in the view of both philosophers about tangibles and abstractions. From Avicenna's perspective, the perfection of the senses should have three aesthetic elements: good order, good composition (composition), and good moderation. Aquinas also uses the concepts of pleasure, proportion, and clarity in his definitions. These elements in the definitions of beauty can be evaluated in some way in connection with the idea of the second perfection.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Metaphysics (Ancient)
Received: 2022/10/17 | Accepted: 2023/03/7 | Published: 2023/03/10
Received: 2022/10/17 | Accepted: 2023/03/7 | Published: 2023/03/10
References
1. Abbasi Hosseinabadi H (2016). Investigation of what perfection is in the definition of self in Ibn Sina's thought. Islamic Wisdom and Philosophy. 5(9):21-34. [Persian] [Link]
2. Abbasi Hosseinabadi H (2019). Comparative study of concept of first and second perfection in Aristotle and Avicenna. Wisdom and Philosophy. 15(57):141-164. [Persian] [Link]
3. Amin Khandaqi J (2019). A comparison of beauty definition in Farabi and Aquinas's views; with emphasis on perfection concept. Art and Media Studies. 1(2):29-52. [Persian] [Link]
4. Amini M (2016). Aesthetic pleasure and its distinction with corporal pleasure from Thomas Aquinas's view. The Journal of Philosophical Theological Research. 17(67):121-142. [Persian] [Link]
5. Anwar E (2003). Ibn Sīnā's philosophical theology of love: A study of the Risālah fī al-'Ishq. Islamic Studies. 42(2):331-345. [Link]
6. Aquinas T (1905). Of God and his creatures. Rickaby J, translator. London: Burns and Oates. [Link]
7. Aquinas T (1956). On the truth of the catholic faith. Bourke VJ, translator. New York: Image Books. [Link]
8. Aquinas T (1997). Summa Contra Gentiles. Best Writings of Thomas Aquinas. Pegis AC, editor. Indianapolis: Hackett. [Link]
9. Aquinas T (2003). On Evil. Regan R, translator. Davies B, editor. New York: Oxford University Press. [Link]
10. Aquinas T (2006). Summa Theologiae. D'Arcy E, translator. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link]
11. Avicenna (1966). KITAB AL-SHIFA (Poetry). Cairo: The Egyptian House of Writing and Translation. [Arabic] [Link]
12. Avicenna (1979). A Treatise on Love. Qom: Bidar. [Arabic] [Link]
13. Avicenna (1983). AL-TALIQAT. Badvi A, editor. Qom: School of Islamic Celebrities. [Arabic] [Link]
14. Avicenna (1984). ALMABDA-VA-ALMAAD. Noorani A, editor. Tehran: University of Tehran. [Arabic] [Link]
15. Avicenna (1986). Miraj Nameh. Mayel Heravi N, editor. Mashhad: Islamic Research Foundation of Astane Qods Razavi. [Persian] [Link]
16. Avicenna (2007). AHWAL AL-NAFS. Ahvani AF, editor. Cairo: Revival of Arabic books. [Arabic] [Link]
17. Bahrami M (2019). The perfection in the aesthetics of Avicena and critique of common approaches for this. Existence and Knowledge. 6(11):209-231. [Persian] [Link]
18. Bahrami M (2020a). Analysis of the relationship between the perfection of object perceived and the perception of pleasure in the thought of Ibn Sina. Ontological Researches. 9(17):271-295. [Persian] [Link]
19. Bahrami M (2020b). The concept of beauty according to the Avicenna's thoughts based on the Studies of pleasure. Avicennian Philosophy Journal. 24(64):29-46. [Persian] [Link]
20. Coomaraswamy AK (1938). Mediaeval aesthetic: II. st. Thomas Aquinas on dionysius, and a note on the relation of beauty to truth. The Art Bulletin. 20(1):66-77. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/00043079.1938.11408663]
21. De Haan DD (2020). Beauty and aesthetic perception in Thomas Aquinas. Beauty and the Good: Recovering the Classical Tradition from Plato to Duns Scotus. Ramos AM, editor. Washington: Catholic University of America Press. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/j.ctv193rr2r.18]
22. Eco U (1988). The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas. Bredin H, translator. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/432009]
23. Eidi F (2019). Comparative study of aspects of beauty semantics and ontology from Avicenna and Mollasadra viewpoint. Comparative Literature Studies. 13(51):203-229. [Persian] [Link]
24. Hashem Nezhad H (2018). Aesthetics in the Works of Avicenna, Suhrawardi and Mulla Sadra. Tehran: Samt. [Persian] [Link]
25. Jafarian M (2022). Avicenna on the principles of aesthetics. HIKMAT-E-ISLAMI. 6(22):101-118. [Persian] [Link]
26. Kovach FJ (1971). The empirical foundations of Thomas Aquinas' philosophy of beauty. The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy. 2(3):93-102. [Link] [DOI:10.5840/swjphil19712332]
27. Maurer AA (1983). About beauty: A thomistic interpretation. Houston: Center for Thomistic Studies. [Link]
28. Melbooyi F (2012). Love and Beauty from the Point of View of Ibn Sina and Suhrawardi [dissertation]. Tehran: Alzahra University. [Persian] [Link]
29. O'Rourke F & Gillespie MP (2022). Beauty: Joyce's Thomist aesthetics. Joyce, Aristotle, and Aquinas. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. [Link] [DOI:10.5744/florida/9780813069265.001.0001]
30. Perl ED (2020). All men by nature desire to know: The classical background of Aquinas on beauty and truth. Beauty and the Good: Recovering the Classical Tradition from Plato to Duns Scotus. Ramos MA, editor. Washington: Catholic University of America Press. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/j.ctv193rr2r.7]
31. Putnam CC (2018). The mode of existence of Beauty: A Thomistic or a Kantian interpretation?. Ancients and Moderns. Ryan JK, editor. Washington: Catholic University of America Press. [Link]
32. Rabiei H (2011). Ibn Sina's Philosophy of Art. Qom: Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy. [Persian] [Link]
33. Saadat Mostafavi H (2012). SHARH-E AL-ESHARAT VA AL-TANBIHAT: Third Namat. Tehran: Imam Sadiq University. [Persian] [Link]
34. Sammon BT (2013). The God who is beauty: Beauty as a divine name in Thomas Aquinas and Dionysius the Areopagite. Cambridge: The Lutterworth Press. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/j.ctt1cgf4sw]
35. Shajari M, Fathi H, Gozali Z (2019). Beauty and its relation to goodness in Thomas Aquinas's philosophical system. Journal of Philosophical Investigations. 13(27):117-138. [Persian] [Link]
36. Soltani Sh (2013). Beauty and Imaginary Perception from Ibn Sina's Point of View [dissertation]. Qom: University of Religions and Denominations. [Persian] [Link]
37. Stump E (2005). Aquinas. New York: Routledge. [Link]
38. Tabatabai MH (2009). NIHĀYAT AL-HIKMAH. Zarei Sabzevari A, editor. Qom: Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [Arabic] [Link]
39. Tatarkiewicz W (1980). A history of six ideas: An essay in aesthetics. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-94-009-8805-7]
40. Tatarkiewicz W (2005). History of Aesthetics (Volume 2): Medieval Aesthetics. Barrett C, editor. New York: Continuum. [Link]
41. Wisnovsky R (2018). Avicenna's Metaphysics in Context. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. [Link]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |