Volume 3, Issue 1 (2023)
jpt 2023, 3(1): 73-87 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abdollahi S, Nasiri M. Murphy’s Holistic Physicalism on Mind Problem. jpt 2023; 3 (1) :73-87
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-64987-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-64987-en.html
1- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Theology, Farabi Campus, Tehran University, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Theology, Farabi Campus, Tehran University, Qom, Iran
2- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Theology, Farabi Campus, Tehran University, Qom, Iran
Abstract: (1578 Views)
Based on the interaction between science and religion, Nancy Murphy turns to a special version of non-transitive physicalism that uses empirical science, physicalism, and the Bible to formulate her holistic physicalism; A middle position between essential dualism and illusionism that defines humans as spiritual beings and hides the problem of the mind within it. Murphy brings the soul into holistic physicalism with his theological assumptions and not with scientific evidence and philosophical arguments. The distinguishing feature of non-transmission physicalism from transmission physicalism is the attention to the explanatory gap in the issue of "supervenience". Holistic physicalism has not filled this gap and has only changed the form of the problem from explaining the relationship between human parts to explaining the relationship between human dimensions. Therefore, combining the universal and weak perceptions of supervenience, along with the positive and negative teachings of holistic physicalism, that is, the use of pure holistic physicalism and avoiding introducing theological presuppositions in a philosophical theory, can be used to solve the problem.
Keywords: Nancey Murphy, Holism, Holistic Physicalism, Non-Reductive Physicalism, Mind Problem, Supervenience, Explanatory Gap
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Philosophy of Mind (Analytical)
Received: 2022/10/23 | Accepted: 2023/03/4 | Published: 2023/03/10
Received: 2022/10/23 | Accepted: 2023/03/4 | Published: 2023/03/10
References
1. Abdollahi S, Nasiri M, Legenhausen M (2017). An assessment of perspective of neurophilosophy on problem of awareness. Hikmat-e-Islami. 3(4):33-68. [Persian] [Link]
2. Abdollahi S, Nasiri M (2022). Illusionism on mind problem. Journal of Philosophical Investigations. In Press. [Persian] [Link]
3. Baker LR (2006). Review of Nancey Murphy, bodies and souls, or spirited bodies?. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. (8):1-6. [Link]
4. Campbell R, Bickhard MH (2011). Physicalism, emergence and downward causation. Axiomathes. 21:33-56. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10516-010-9128-6]
5. Chalmers D (2007). The hard problem of consciousness. In: Velmans M, Schneider S, editors. The Blackwell companion to consciousness. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 225-235. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/9780470751466.ch18]
6. Chalmers D (2018). The meta-problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 25(9-10):6-61. [Link]
7. Chalmers D (2020). Debunking arguments for illusionism about consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 27(5-6):258-281. [Link]
8. Churchland P (2012). Matter and consciousness. Gholami A, translator. Tehran: Markaz Pub. [Persian] [Link]
9. Churchland PS (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind-brain. Massachusetts: MIT Press. [Link]
10. Dennett DC (1992). The self as a center of narrative gravity. In: Kessel F, Cole P, Johnson D, editors. Self and consciousness. NJ: Erlbaum. [Link]
11. Dennett DC (2019). Welcome to strong illusionism. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 26(9-10):48-58. [Link]
12. DeVries W (2021). Wilfrid Sellars. In: Zalta EN, editor. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sellars/ [Link]
13. Gasser G (2007). How successful is naturalism?. Berlin: Ontos Verlag. [Link] [DOI:10.1515/9783110328950]
14. Grace RJ (2003). A critique of nancey murphy's nonreductive physicalist account of the human person and the abandonment of the human soul. California: Berkeley. [Link]
15. Gray AJ (2010). Whatever happened to the soul? Some theological implications of neuroscience. Mental Health, Religion and Culture. 13(6):637-648. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13674676.2010.488424]
16. Halvorson H (2016). Why methodological naturalism?. In: Clark KJ, editor. Blackwell Companion to Naturalism. New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/9781118657775.ch10]
17. Hershenov DB (2007). Book review of Nancey Murphy's bodies and souls, or spirited bodies?. Religious Studies. 43(2):237-242. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S0034412507008967]
18. Joubert CWT (2011). Mindfulness and the Brain: A christian critique of some aspects of neuroscience. Conspectus: The Journal of the South African Theological Seminary. 12(99):59-87. [Link]
19. Kim J (1993). Supervenience and mind: Selected philosophical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511625220]
20. Moreland JP (2016). A critique of and alternative to Nancey Murphy's christian physicalism. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 8(2):107-128. [Link] [DOI:10.24204/ejpr.v8i2.60]
21. Morvarid H (2008). Carnap's and Sellars' theories on universals. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research. 9(3):89-105. [Persian] [Link]
22. Murphy N (1997). Reconciling theology and science: A radical reformation perspective. London: Pandora Press. [Link]
23. Murphy N (1999a). Physicalism without reductionism: Toward a scientifically, philosophically, and theologically sound. Zygon. 34(4):551-571. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/0591-2385.00236]
24. Murphy N (1999b). Theology and science within a Lakatosian program. Zygon. 34(4):629-642. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/0591-2385.00241]
25. Murphy N (2002a). How physicalists can avoid being reductionists. In: Hilary DR, Mark WM, editors. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Cosmology and Biological Evolution (ATF Science and Theology Series). Hindmarsh: Australian Theological Forum Press. [Link]
26. Murphy N (2002b). Why christians should be physicalists. In: Hilary DR, Mark WM, editors. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Cosmology and Biological Evolution (ATF Science and Theology Series). Hindmarsh: Australian Theological Forum Press. [Link]
27. Murphy N (2006). Bodies and souls, or spirited bodies?. Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511802805]
28. Murphy N (2008). Is nonreductive physicalism an oxymoron?. Metanexus Institute. 1-14. [Link]
29. Murphy N (2011). Avoiding neurobiological reductionism: The role of downward causation in complex systems. New Jersey: FT Press. [Link]
30. Murphy N (2013). Nonreductive physicalism. In: Runehov ALC, Oviedo L, editors. Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions. Dordrecht: Springer. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_793]
31. Murphy N, Brown W, Newton M (1998). Whatever happened to the soul?; scientific and theological portraits of human nature. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. [Link]
32. Nasiri M (2004). Methodology of Science and Theology. Qom: Imam Khomeini Institute Publication. [Persian] [Link]
33. Popper KR, Eccles JC (1977). The Self and its Brain. New York: Springer. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-61891-8]
34. Sajedi H, Sajedi A (2019). Non-reductive physicalism: An analysis and critique of Nancy Murphy. Religious Anthroplogy. 15(40):123-144. [Persian] [Link]
35. Shagrir O (1999). More on global supervenience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 59(3):691-701. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/2653789]
36. Siemens DF (2005). Neuroscience, theology, and unintended consequences. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith. 57(3):187-190. [Link]
37. Sukopp T (2007). How Successful Is Naturalism? Talking about Achievements beyond Theism and Scientism. In: Gasser G, editor. How successful is naturalism?. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. pp. 77-104. [Link] [DOI:10.1515/9783110328950.77]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |