Volume 4, Issue 1 (2024)                   jpt 2024, 4(1): 61-69 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Eslami S. Caution in Supererogation. jpt 2024; 4 (1) :61-69
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-73751-en.html
Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (947 Views)
It seems natural to think that Dehqan-e Fadakar did something beyond his duty. But this judgment requires explanation. How come there are most reasons for an action and thus it is praiseworthy, but it is not obligatory? Discussions about supererogation start with this question but go further beyond that. In this short note for Farsi readers, I mention some aspects of the problem of supererogation. Furthermore, I also mention “The Cautionary Account of Supererogation” recently proposed based on the ethical work of Miskawayh (d. 1030). So, I discuss the importance of the problem and mention some neglected resources for further explanation.
 
Full-Text [PDF 576 kb]   (771 Downloads)    
Article Type: Note | Subject: Philosophy of Ethics (Analytical)
Received: 2024/02/6 | Accepted: 2024/05/13 | Published: 2024/05/30
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Nasr Bridge,Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 14115111 (s.eslami@modares.ac.ir)

References
1. Crisp R (2013). Supererogation and virtue. In: Timmons M, editor. Oxford studies in normative ethics: Volume 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 13-34. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685905.003.0002]
2. Eslami SM, Archer A (2024). The cautionary account of supererogation. The Philosophical Quarterly. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/pq/pqae017]
3. Ferry M (2013). Does morality demand our very best? On moral prescriptions and the line of duty. Philosophical Studies. 165(2):573-589. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11098-012-9968-6]
4. Gert J (2003). Requiring and justifying: Two dimensions of normative strength. Erkenntnis. 59(1):5-36. [Link] [DOI:10.1023/A:1023930108900]
5. Gert J (2013). Overridingness, moral. In: LaFollette H, editor. The international encyclopedia of ethics. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee010]
6. Hajighasemi MR (2023). Supererogation from ethics to epistemology [MA dissertation]. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. [Persian] [Link]
7. Heyd D (2015). Can virtue ethics account for supererogation?. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements. 77:25-47. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S1358246115000193]
8. Horgan T, Timmons M (2010). Untying a knot from the inside out: Reflections on the "Paradox" of supererogation. Social Philosophy and Policy. 27(2):29-63. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S026505250999015X]
9. Kawall J (2003). Self-regarding supererogatory actions. Journal of Social Philosophy. 34(3):487-498. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/1467-9833.00196]
10. Miller C (2019). Overview of contemporary metaethics and normative ethical theory. Eslami M, translator. Tehran: Ansoo Publication. [Persian] [Link]
11. Portmore DW (2021). Morality and practical reasons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/9781108580724]
12. Scanlon TM (2014). Being realistic about reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678488.001.0001]
13. Tusi N (1985). Nasirean Ethics. Minavi M, Heidari A, editors. Tehran: Kharazmi. [Persian] [Link]
14. Urmson JO (1958). Saints and heroes. In: Melden AI, editor. Essays in moral philosophy. Seattle: University of Washington Press. p. 198-216. [Link]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.