1- Department of Philosophy and logic, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Islamic philosophy, Shahid Motahari Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract: (331 Views)
Through the Personal Unity of Existence, Mulla Sadra explains the relationship between the necessary and contingent beings using concepts such as manifestations and appearances. While they align with the PUE, their linguistic vagueness may lead to multiple interpretations. This study, adopting an analytical-critical approach and drawing on metaphysical grounding, seeks to provide a framework for resolving this vagueness. Grounding, characterized by its non-causal nature and hyper-intentionality, enables a redefinition of these Sadrian notions. It also contributes to clarifying Mulla Sadra’s terminology and a more precise understanding of the necessary-contingent relationship. By integrating traditional and analytical perspectives, this research highlights the potential of metaphysical grounding in analyzing Sadra’s theory.
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:
Metaphysics (Analytical) Received: 2025/01/29 | Accepted: 2025/02/27 | Published: 2025/03/10
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Philosophy and Logic, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal-e Ale-Ahmad Highway, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 1411713116 (hojjat.imani@gmail.com) |
References
1. Adams RM (1999). Finite and infinite goods: A framework for ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [
Link]
2. Feynman RP (1964). The Feynman lectures on physics. Boston: Addison-Wesley. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1063/1.3051743]
3. Fine K (1995). Ontological dependence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 95(1):269-290. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1093/aristotelian/95.1.269]
4. Fine K (2002). The question of realism. In: Individuals, essence and identity: Themes of analytic metaphysics. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 3-48. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1007/978-94-017-1866-0_1]
5. Fine K (2012). Guide to ground. In: Correia F, Schnieder B, editors. Metaphysical grounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 37-80. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139149136.002]
6. Husserl E (1901). Logical investigations (Volume 2). London: Routledge. [
Link]
7. Kripke S (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [
Link]
8. Moore GE (1903). The refutation of idealism. Mind. 12(48):433-453. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1093/mind/XII.4.433]
9. Mulla Sadra (1981a). The transcendent philosophy in the four journeys of the intellect (Volume 1). Beirut: DAR IHYA' AL-TURATH AL-'ARABI. [Arabic] [
Link]
10. Mulla Sadra (1981b). The transcendent philosophy in the four journeys of the intellect (Volume 2). Beirut: DAR IHYA' AL-TURATH AL-'ARABI. [Arabic] [
Link]
11. Mulla Sadra (1981c). Divine witnesses in spiritual methods (Volume 1). Tehran: MARKAZ NASHR-E DANESHGAHI. [Arabic] [
Link]
12. Mulla Sadra (1981d). Divine witnesses in spiritual methods (Volume 2). Tehran: MARKAZ NASHR-E DANESHGAHI. [Arabic] [
Link]
13. Mulla Sadra (1981e). Divine witnesses in spiritual methods (Volume 3). Tehran: MARKAZ NASHR-E DANESHGAHI. [Arabic] [
Link]
14. Quine WVO (1960). Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press. [
Link]
15. Schaffer J (2009). On what grounds what. In: Chalmers D, Manley D, Wasserman R, editors. Metametaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 347-383. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780199546046.003.0012]
16. Schaffer J (2016). Grounding in the image of causation. Philosophical Studies. 173(1):49-100. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1007/s11098-014-0438-1]
17. Van Benthem J (2011). Logical dynamics of information and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511974533]