Volume 5, Issue 2 (2025)
jpt 2025, 5(2): 223-238 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hajipour Karimi S, Shamsabadi Hoseini M. An Ontological Perspective on the Legal Industries in Ibn Sina's Philosophy; Connecting Social Tradition to Divine Tradition. jpt 2025; 5 (2) :223-238
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-79588-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-79588-en.html
1- Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Theology, Imam Sadiq (AS) University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (880 Views)
Avicenna, by offering two distinct classifications of the sciences, presents different perspectives on the nature and purpose of knowledge. One classification is based on the Aristotelian method, while the other is a unique division outlined in his work Al-Mantiq al-Mashriqiyyin (The Logic of the Easterners). By integrating philosophy (ḥikmah) and religious law (sharīʿah), Avicenna emphasizes the harmony between reason and religion.
He introduces sharīʿah as the primary means for the emergence of sunnah (tradition), aimed at realizing justice and regulating both individual life (acts of worship) and social life (transactions). Tradition, on the one hand, is established by the sānni (lawgiver or prophet) to manage society and ensure the survival of humankind, and on the other, is linked to the divine sunnah, through which God's providence extends goodness to creation.
Avicenna underscores the necessity of both the shāriʿ (lawgiver) and the caliph for the preservation and sustainability of tradition. This article analyzes Avicenna’s perspective on the ṣanāʾiʿ shāriʿah (legislative crafts) and their relationship to revelation, the Active Intellect, tradition, sharīʿah, and human felicity.
He introduces sharīʿah as the primary means for the emergence of sunnah (tradition), aimed at realizing justice and regulating both individual life (acts of worship) and social life (transactions). Tradition, on the one hand, is established by the sānni (lawgiver or prophet) to manage society and ensure the survival of humankind, and on the other, is linked to the divine sunnah, through which God's providence extends goodness to creation.
Avicenna underscores the necessity of both the shāriʿ (lawgiver) and the caliph for the preservation and sustainability of tradition. This article analyzes Avicenna’s perspective on the ṣanāʾiʿ shāriʿah (legislative crafts) and their relationship to revelation, the Active Intellect, tradition, sharīʿah, and human felicity.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Metaphysics (Islamic)
Received: 2025/02/19 | Accepted: 2025/04/11 | Published: 2025/04/30
Received: 2025/02/19 | Accepted: 2025/04/11 | Published: 2025/04/30
References
1. Alamolhoda SA (2005). A survey of Ibn Rushd's critique of Ibn Sina in metaphysical philosophy. Philosophy of Religion Research. 3(2):109-128. [Persian] [Link]
2. Gutas D (2002). The study of Arabic philosophy in the twentieth century: An Essay on the historiography of Arabic philosophy. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. 29(1):5-25. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13530190220124043]
3. Hammūdah Gh (1972). IBN SĪNĀ BAYNA AL-DĪN WA-AL-FALSAFAH. Cairo: MAJMA' AL-BUHUTH AL-ISLAMIYAH. [Arabic] [Link]
4. Ibn Rushd (2005). TEHAFUT AL-TEHAFUT. Halabi AA, translator. Tehran: Jami. [Persian] [Link]
5. Ibn Sina (1908). RASALAH FI AQSAM AL-ULUM AL-AQLIYYAH. In: TIS' RASAIL FI AL-HIKMAH WA AL-TABII'AT. EGYPT: MATBA'AH HINDIYYAH AL-MUSKI. [Arabic] [Link]
6. Ibn Sina (1923). AL-ISHARAT WA AL-TANBIHAT MA'A AL-SHARH (Volume 3). Tusi AD, Qutb Al-Din Al-Razi MM, commentator. Qom: DAFTAR NASHR AL-KITAB. [Arabic] [Link]
7. Ibn Sina (1944). AL-MABDA' WA AL-MA'AD. 1st edition. Tehran: Publications of the Institute of Islamic Studies, McGill University in Cooperation with the University of Tehran. [Arabic] [Link]
8. Ibn Sina (1945). AL-NAJAT MEN AL-GHARAQ FI BAHR AL-DALALAT. Daneshpazhouh MT, editor. Tehran: Tehran University Press and Publications. [Arabic] [Link]
9. Ibn Sina (1966). AL-SHIFA (logic/rhetoric). Badawi AR, editor. Cairo: AL-DAR AL-MISRIYAH LIL-TALIF WA AL-TARJAMAH. [Arabic] [Link]
10. Ibn Sina (1975). AL-ELAHIAT FI KITAB AL-SHIFA (Volume 2). Madkoor I, editor. Egypt: ALHAY'AAL-MISRIYA AL-AMMA LIL-KITAB. [Arabic] [Link]
11. Ibn Sina (1984). MANṬIQ AL-MASHRIQIYYIN. Qom: NASHR-E MAR'ASHI NAJAFI. [Arabic] [Link]
12. Ibn Sina (1985). RISALAH ADHWIYA. Khadiwjam H, editor. Tehran: ENTESHARAT-E ETELA'AT. [Persian] [Link]
13. Ibn Sina (1996). AL-NAFS MIN KITAB AL-SHIFA. Hasan Zadeh Amoli H, editor. Qom: MAKTAB AL-I'LAM AL-ISLAMI. [Arabic] [Link]
14. Ibn Sina (2004). DANESHNAMEH ALA'I (Theology). Hamedan: Bu-Ali Sina University. [Persian] [Link]
15. Ibn Sina (2006). Translation and explanation of theology of Najat. Yathrebi Y, translator. Qom: BUSTAN-E KETAB. [Persian] [Link]
16. Ibn Sina (2007). RISALAH FI AL-NAFS WA BAQA'HA WA MA'ADHA. Paris: Dar Biblion. [Arabic] [Link]
17. Ibn Sina (2008). NAFS AL-SHIFA. Naiji MH, translator. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. [Persian] [Link]
18. Ibn Sina (2009). Theology of the healing (AL-SHIFA). Dadju I, translator. Tehran: Amir Kabir. [Persian] [Link]
19. Ibn Sina (2012). Translation and explanation of ISHARAT WA AL-TANBIHAT. Malekshahi H, translator. Tehran: Soroush. [Persian] [Link]
20. Kadivar M (2009). Ibn Sina and the classification of wisdom: Critical analysis, investigation, and correction of the treatise "AQSAM AL-HIKMAH". Sophia Perennis. 5(9):35-138. [Persian] [Link]
21. Kamalizadeh T (2023). Al-Farabi and Ibn Sina on the relationship between philosophy and jurisprudence in the classification of sciences. Avecinnian Philosophy Journal. 27(70):59-82. [Persian] [Link]
22. Malayeri M (2005). Philosophical explanation of revelation. Qom: Taha Publications. [Persian] [Link]
23. Nasr SH (2003). Three Muslim sages. Aram A, translator. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [Persian] [Link]
24. Qutb Al-Din Shirazi MM (1990). DURREH AL-TAJ LIGHARREH AL-DABBAJ. Tehran: Hikmat. [Arabic] [Link]
25. Razi F (1994). SHARH 'UYUN AL-HIKMAH (Volume 2). Tehran: MU'ASSASAH AL-SADIQ ALEH AL-SALAM. [Arabic] [Link]
26. Samadieh M, Safarzadeh Maleki A (2023). Explanation of Avicenna's double comment about the relationship between practical wisdom and Sharia and comparing it with the view of. Journal of Religious Research and Efficiency. 3(2):83-94. [Persian] [Link]
27. Strauss L (1995). Philosophy and law: Contributions to the understanding of Maimonides and his predecessors. Adler E, translator. Albany: State University of New York Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1353/book10769]
28. Tusi ND (1991). AKHLAQ-E NASIRI. Tehran: Islamiyah. [Persian] [Link]
29. Zabihi M (2023). An evaluative study of the principles of practical wisdom in Al-Farabi and Avicenna. AYENEH MA'REFAT. 22(4):1-24. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.52547/jipt.2023.229637.1347]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |