- Abdollahi J (2022). An enquiry into peerhood in disagreements over the existence of God: The impossibility of achieving peerhood. Journal of Recognition. 14(2):195-222. [Persian]
- Abdollahi J (2023). Non-instrumental reasons and the problem of Skepticism in conciliationism. Philosophy of Religion Research. 21(2):49-60. [Persian]
- Bogardus T (2013). Disagreeing with the (Religious) Skeptic. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74(1):5-17.
- Choo F (2021). The epistemic significance of religious disagreements: Cases of Unconfirmed superiority disagreements. Topoi. 40(5):1139-1147.
- Christensen D (2007). Epistemology and disagreement: The good news. Philosophical Review. 116:187–217.
- Christensen D (2013). Epistemic modesty defended. In: The epistemology of disagreement: new essays. Christensen D, Lackey J, editors. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 77.
- Conee E (2009). Peerage. Episteme. 6(3):313-323.
- Dellsén F, Baghramian M (2021). Disagreement in science: Introduction to the special issue. Synthese. 198:6011-6021.
- Elga A (2007). Reflection and disagreement. Noûs. 41(3):478-502.
- Feldman R (2007). Reasonable religious disagreements. In: Philosophers without God: meditations on atheism and the secular life. Antony L editor. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 194-214.
- Feyerabend P (1961). Knowledge without foundations. In Realism, rationalism and scientific method. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 50-78.
- Feyerabend P (1962). Explanation, reduction and empiricism. In Scientific explanation, space and time, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. III). Feigl H, Maxwell G editors. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 28-97.
- Feyerabend P (1965). Reply to criticism: Comments on smart, Sellars and Putnam. Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science. 2:223-261.
- Feyerabend P (1968). Outline of a pluralistic theory of knowledge and action. In Planning for diversity and choice. Anderson S editor. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 275–284.
- Feyerabend P (1975). Against method. 1st ed. London: Verso Books.
- Feyerabend P (1977). Changing patterns of reconstruction. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 28(4):351–369.
- Feyerabend P (2010). Against method. 4th ed. London: Verso Books.
- Feyerabend P (1981). Two models of epistemic change. In: Problems of empiricism, philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Feyerabend PK editor. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 65-80.
- Feyerabend PK (1999). Knowledge, science and relativism (Vol. 3). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Hojjati G (2018). Conciliationist approach to the challenge of religious disagreement. Philosophy of Religion Research. 16(1):19-40. [Persian]
- Kelly T (2005). The epistemic significance of disagreement. In: Oxford studies in epistemology. Szabo T editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp 174-175.
- Kinzel K, Kusch M (2018). De-idealizing disagreement, rethinking relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 26(1):40-71.
- Kraft J (2012). The epistemology of religious disagreement: A better understanding. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
- Kraft J (2021). Incommensurability and wide-ranging arguments for steadfastness in religious disagreements: Increasingly popular, but eventually complacent. Topoi. 40:1147-1159.
- Kuhn T (1977). Objectivity, value judgement, and theory choice. In The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 320-329.
- Kuhn TS (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Lougheed K (2020). The epistemic benefits of disagreement. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
- Matheson J (2015). The epistemic significance of disagreement. New York: PalgraveMacmillan.
- Mercier H, Sperber D (2017). The enigma of reason. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Pittard J (2014). Conciliationism and religious disagreement. In: Challenges to moral and religious belief: disagreement and evolution. Bergmann M, Kain P editors. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Seidel M (2021). Kuhn’s two accounts of rational disagreement in science: An interpretation and critique. Synthese. 198:6023-6051.
- Shaw J (2017). Was Feyerabend an anarchist? The structure(s) of ‘Anything Goes’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 64:11–21.
- Shaw J (2021). Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: Reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy. Synthese. 198:6053–6084.
- Taghavi M (2016). The origins of Feyerabend’s anarchistic epistemology. Philosophy of Science. 6(2):1-14. [Persian]
