In the Sixth Discourse of the Zad al-Musafirin, Nasir Khusraw presents his most extensive argument refuting the claim of the materialists that the celestial spheres are the creators of the universe. This argument’s foundation comprises concepts related to the motion of elemental natures and generated beings, as well as the subjugated or dominant nature of celestial spheres and their rotational motion. The findings ultimately reveal that, while Nasir Khusraw’s argument is methodologically sound and formally valid, its premises contain unsubstantiated assumptions and exhibit false analogies. Additionally, the argument includes auxiliary lemmas, some of which hold scholarly value, while others are redundant and could be excised from its core framework.
- Anvari, Saeed; Dādbeh, Asghar (2007). The Theory of the Spheres and Its Influence on Islamic Philosophy, Mashkāt al-Nūr, Vol. 11, Autumn & Winter, No. 38, pp. 47–88. [Persian] - Ardeshir, Mohammad (2010). Mathematical Logic, 2nd edition. Tehran: Hermes. [Persian] - Fallāhī, Asadollah (2010). The Impossibility of the Ṣiddīqīn Argument without Philosophical Presuppositions in Modern Logic, Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 7, Summer, No. 6, pp. 71–96. [Persian] - Ibn Sīnā; Malekshāhī, Hassan (2022). Translation and Commentary on Avicenna’s al-Ishārāt wa’l-Tanbīhāt: Logic, Vol. II, 10th edition. Tehran: Soroush. [Persian] - Lemmon, E, J, (1998), Beginning Logic,19th edition, Boca Raton-London-New York- Washington, Champs and Hall. - Mehrabadi, Katayoon; Hassanzadeh Niri, Mohammad-Hassan (2025). Formalizing three reasonings of Hojwiri in first-order predicate logic, Logic Studies, Winter, Vol. 15, No. 2. [Persian] - Nasir Khusraw, Abu-Miīn Qubadiyani Balkhi; Bazl al-Raḥman, Mohammad (1962). Zad al-Musafirin, 1st edition. Tehran: Masjid-i Solṭaniyya. [Persian] - Ranjbar, Homa; Hosseini, Davoud; Saeedi Mehr, Mohammad (2013). “The Formulation of Avicenna’s Argument in al-Najāt on the Basis of First-Order Predicate Logic, Scientific-Research Biannual Journal of Hikmat-i Sīnavī, Vol. 17, Autumn & Winter, pp. 17–40. [Persian] - Reiner, E., & Pingree, D. (2005). Babylonian Planetary Omens: Part 4. Brill. - Rochberg, F. (2004). The Heavenly Writing: Divination, Horoscopy, and Astronomy in Mesopotamian Culture. Cambridge University Press.
Mehrabadi,K. , Hasanzadeh Niri,M. and Hasanzadeh Niri,M. (2025). Validation of Naser Khusraw's Argument Rejecting the Celestial Spheres as Creator. Philosophical Thought, 5(4), 663-688. doi: 10.58209/jpt.5.4.663
MLA
Mehrabadi,K. , , Hasanzadeh Niri,M. , and Hasanzadeh Niri,M. . "Validation of Naser Khusraw's Argument Rejecting the Celestial Spheres as Creator", Philosophical Thought, 5, 4, 2025, 663-688. doi: 10.58209/jpt.5.4.663
HARVARD
Mehrabadi K., Hasanzadeh Niri M., Hasanzadeh Niri M. (2025). 'Validation of Naser Khusraw's Argument Rejecting the Celestial Spheres as Creator', Philosophical Thought, 5(4), pp. 663-688. doi: 10.58209/jpt.5.4.663
CHICAGO
K. Mehrabadi, M. Hasanzadeh Niri and M. Hasanzadeh Niri, "Validation of Naser Khusraw's Argument Rejecting the Celestial Spheres as Creator," Philosophical Thought, 5 4 (2025): 663-688, doi: 10.58209/jpt.5.4.663
VANCOUVER
Mehrabadi K., Hasanzadeh Niri M., Hasanzadeh Niri M. Validation of Naser Khusraw's Argument Rejecting the Celestial Spheres as Creator. Philosophical Thought, 2025; 5(4): 663-688. doi: 10.58209/jpt.5.4.663