Does the Theory-Ladenness of Observation Necessarily Entail Constructivism?

Mamkarimmi, H.; Mortazavy, M.

Does the Theory-Ladenness of Observation Necessarily Entail Constructivism?

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

H. Mamkarimmi ¹

M. Mortazavy ²

¹ Department of Scientific Research, Education, Mahabad, Iran

² Department of General Psychology, T.C. (Tabriz Campus), Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

The thesis of the theory-ladenness of observation claims that neutral, unbiased observation is impossible. Based on this thesis, some philosophers have inferred that facts—or more precisely, reality independent of mental influences—do not exist, and that human knowledge of the world is a social construct. The aim of this paper is to assess whether the theory-ladenness of observation necessarily entails a constructivist view, or whether it still allows us to speak about reality. To this end, the concepts of "theory-ladenness of observation" and "constructivism" will be clarified. It will then be argued that although the theory-ladenness of observation is acceptable, we are not compelled to adopt constructivism; rather, this thesis can provide an attractive framework for realist theses. Finally, the paper indicates some implications of this view for evaluating epistemological proposals.

Keywords

Observation

Theory-Ladenness

Constructivism

Reality

Subjects

Philosophy of Science (Analytical)

- Abdollahi J (2023). Theory-ladenness of observation thesis and religious science. Journal of Explorations in Philosophy and Religion. 1(2):131-149. [Persian]

- Barnes B, Bloor D (1982). Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge. In: Hollis M, Lukes S, editors. Rationality and relativism. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 21-47.

- Boghossian P (2006). Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Chalmers AF (1990). Science and its fabrication. Taqvi M, translator. Qom: Open University Press. [Persian]

- Dretske F (1969). Seeing and knowing. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

- Feyerabend P (1975). Against method. London: New Left Books.

- Fodor J (1984). Observation reconsidered. Philosophy of Science. 51(1):23-43.

- Gergen KJ (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 26(2):309-320.

- Gergen KJ (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.

- Gergen KJ (2001). Construction in contention: Toward consequential resolutions. Theory and Psychology. 11(3):419-432.

- Gergen KJ (2009). An invitation to social construction. 2^nd edition. London: Sage Publications.

- Gergen KJ (2010). The acculturated brain. Theory and Psychology. 20(6):795-816.

- Hacking I (1981). Do we see through a microscope?. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 62(4):305-322.

- Hacking I (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Hacking I (1999). The social construction of what?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

- Hanson NR (1977). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science: Cup archive.

- Inusah H (2025). The hidden relativism within epistemological universalism and the prospect for epistemic diversity in decoloniality. The Philosophical Forum. 56(3):84-92.

- Kuhn TS (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

- Kukla A (2008). Observation. In: Psillos S, Curd M, editors. The Routledge companion to philosophy of science. London: Routledge. p. 396-404.

- Kusch M (2021). Relativism in the philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Nola R (2003). ‘Naked before reality; Skinless before the absolute’. Science & Education. 12:131-166.

- Poostforush M, Taqavi M (2021). Bhaskar’s minimal methodology: An argument against relativism. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities. 27(109):1-14. [Persian]

- Sankey H (1999). The theory-dependence of observation. Cogito. 13(3):201-206.

- Sankey H (2023). The objectivity of science. Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz. 17(45):1-10.

- Seidel M (2014). Epistemic relativism: A constructive critique. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

- Xu X (2022). Epistemic diversity and cross-cultural comparative research: Ontology, challenges, and outcomes. Globalisation, Societies and Education. 20(1):36-48.

- Yang LY, Gergen K (2012). Social construction and its development: Liping Yang interviews Kenneth Gergen. Psychological Studies. 57(2):126-133.