Volume 5, Issue 2 (2025)
jpt 2025, 5(2): 165-178 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mohseni M. Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy; Interpretations and Applications. jpt 2025; 5 (2) :165-178
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-79433-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-79433-en.html
Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 609 kb]
(229 Downloads)
| Abstract (HTML) (1047 Views)
Full-Text: (7 Views)
I critically examine Ludwig Wittgenstein's early philosophy as presented in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, focusing on its interpretations and applications. At the core of Wittgenstein's early thought lies the idea that language mirrors the world through a structural correspondence, where names represent simple objects and propositions depict possible states of affairs. This structural isomorphism underpins Wittgenstein's "picture theory of meaning," asserting that language meaningfully describes reality only when its logical form corresponds to the world's structure. Wittgenstein's aim in the Tractatus was to provide a definitive account of the relationship between language and the world, and to show the limits of what can be meaningfully said. This ambition not only engages with core questions in the philosophy of language but also raises broader questions about metaphysics and ethics, which are treated as being beyond the scope of meaningful linguistic expression.
Wittgenstein posits that the world consists of facts, not things, where simple objects combine into states of affairs. Language reflects these states through propositions composed of elementary names. This picture theory emphasizes that a proposition is meaningful only if it can depict a possible reality, thus ruling out nonsensical or metaphysical statements. Furthermore, Wittgenstein's distinction between what can be said and what can only be shown emerges as a key theme. While logical form and ethical values cannot be directly articulated, they manifest implicitly in the limits of linguistic expression.
I offered an analysis of the logical structure of language as proposed by Wittgenstein. According to the Tractatus, the world is all that is the case, and every meaningful proposition is a logical picture of a fact [Wittgenstein, 1961: 1-2]. Names correspond to simple objects, and the combination of names into a proposition mirrors the structure of the world. This view excludes complex or composite concepts from having independent meaning unless they can be decomposed into elementary propositions. Wittgenstein's approach to logic emphasizes that logical propositions are tautologies, meaning they do not describe the world but rather reveal its formal structure [Wittgenstein, 1961: 6.1].
A central focus of my article is the interpretative ambiguity surrounding the final sections of the Tractatus, particularly Wittgenstein's famous dictum: "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent" [Wittgenstein, 1961: 7]. I review three dominant interpretations: the positivist, the transcendental, and the therapeutic reading. The positivist interpretation, associated with the Vienna Circle, views Wittgenstein as asserting that only empirical propositions have cognitive meaning, thereby dismissing metaphysical and ethical discourse as nonsensical [Engelmann, 1967]. However, this reading overlooks Wittgenstein's emphasis on the ineffable and mystical dimensions of human experience [Monk, 1991].
The transcendental reading, as advocated by Elizabeth Anscombe and others, suggests that Wittgenstein aimed to reveal the conditions for meaningful representation rather than to eliminate metaphysics [Anscombe, 1959]. This reading emphasizes that the Tractatus outlines the logical form underlying all language while simultaneously acknowledging the limits of linguistic expression. Ethical and metaphysical truths, while inexpressible, are not thereby meaningless; instead, they point to the limits of sense and the structure of reality itself [Cavel, 1984]. This view maintains that Wittgenstein's silence is not a rejection of metaphysical claims but an acknowledgment that their meaning transcends linguistic articulation.
The therapeutic interpretation posits that the Tractatus does not advance a positive metaphysical theory but seeks to expose the reader's confusion in attempting to articulate the inexpressible [Conant, 1991; Diamond, 1992]. According to this view, Wittgenstein aimed to cure the reader of philosophical illusions by demonstrating the boundaries of sense. This interpretation aligns with the self-undermining nature of the Tractatus, where Wittgenstein compares his propositions to a ladder that must be discarded after use [Wittgenstein, 1961: 6.54]. The therapeutic reading highlights Wittgenstein's intention to dissolve rather than solve philosophical problems by demonstrating that many such problems stem from misunderstandings of language.
I further discuss the implications of Wittgenstein's early philosophy for ethics, religion, and aesthetics. While the Tractatus precludes speaking meaningfully about ethical and spiritual matters, it does not deny their significance. Instead, it suggests that the most important aspects of life lie beyond the limits of language [Stroll, 2014]. Wittgenstein's reflections on death, the meaning of life, and the mystical reveal a profound commitment to the idea that the ethical cannot be captured in propositional form but must instead be shown through lived experience. This idea resonates with Kierkegaard's notion that truth is subjective and suggests that ethical and existential insights are fundamentally experiential rather than discursive [Oswalt, 2017].
A critical evaluation of these interpretations highlights their respective strengths and limitations. The positivist reading, while influential, misrepresents Wittgenstein's broader concerns by reducing his work to a verificationist thesis. The transcendental reading effectively captures the complexity of Wittgenstein's logical insights, yet struggles to reconcile his emphasis on the ineffable. Meanwhile, the therapeutic reading offers a compelling account of Wittgenstein's methodology but risks dismissing the philosophical substance of the Tractatus. Each interpretation reveals different aspects of Wittgenstein's thought, and I suggest that a comprehensive understanding of the Tractatus requires integrating insights from all three perspectives.
I conclude by reflecting on the enduring legacy of Wittgenstein's early philosophy. By drawing a clear boundary between the sayable and the unsayable, Wittgenstein redefines the scope of philosophical inquiry. His insights continue to inform debates in philosophy of language, metaphysics, and ethics. The Tractatus invites readers to recognize the limits of linguistic representation while acknowledging the profound mysteries that lie beyond them. This dual recognition of the power and limits of language remains one of Wittgenstein's most lasting contributions to philosophical thought. Moreover, Wittgenstein's acknowledgment that the most significant aspects of life cannot be articulated in language resonates with broader existential and mystical traditions. His work remains a touchstone for those seeking to understand the relationship between language, thought, and reality, and his insights continue to provoke philosophical reflection and debate.
Wittgenstein posits that the world consists of facts, not things, where simple objects combine into states of affairs. Language reflects these states through propositions composed of elementary names. This picture theory emphasizes that a proposition is meaningful only if it can depict a possible reality, thus ruling out nonsensical or metaphysical statements. Furthermore, Wittgenstein's distinction between what can be said and what can only be shown emerges as a key theme. While logical form and ethical values cannot be directly articulated, they manifest implicitly in the limits of linguistic expression.
I offered an analysis of the logical structure of language as proposed by Wittgenstein. According to the Tractatus, the world is all that is the case, and every meaningful proposition is a logical picture of a fact [Wittgenstein, 1961: 1-2]. Names correspond to simple objects, and the combination of names into a proposition mirrors the structure of the world. This view excludes complex or composite concepts from having independent meaning unless they can be decomposed into elementary propositions. Wittgenstein's approach to logic emphasizes that logical propositions are tautologies, meaning they do not describe the world but rather reveal its formal structure [Wittgenstein, 1961: 6.1].
A central focus of my article is the interpretative ambiguity surrounding the final sections of the Tractatus, particularly Wittgenstein's famous dictum: "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent" [Wittgenstein, 1961: 7]. I review three dominant interpretations: the positivist, the transcendental, and the therapeutic reading. The positivist interpretation, associated with the Vienna Circle, views Wittgenstein as asserting that only empirical propositions have cognitive meaning, thereby dismissing metaphysical and ethical discourse as nonsensical [Engelmann, 1967]. However, this reading overlooks Wittgenstein's emphasis on the ineffable and mystical dimensions of human experience [Monk, 1991].
The transcendental reading, as advocated by Elizabeth Anscombe and others, suggests that Wittgenstein aimed to reveal the conditions for meaningful representation rather than to eliminate metaphysics [Anscombe, 1959]. This reading emphasizes that the Tractatus outlines the logical form underlying all language while simultaneously acknowledging the limits of linguistic expression. Ethical and metaphysical truths, while inexpressible, are not thereby meaningless; instead, they point to the limits of sense and the structure of reality itself [Cavel, 1984]. This view maintains that Wittgenstein's silence is not a rejection of metaphysical claims but an acknowledgment that their meaning transcends linguistic articulation.
The therapeutic interpretation posits that the Tractatus does not advance a positive metaphysical theory but seeks to expose the reader's confusion in attempting to articulate the inexpressible [Conant, 1991; Diamond, 1992]. According to this view, Wittgenstein aimed to cure the reader of philosophical illusions by demonstrating the boundaries of sense. This interpretation aligns with the self-undermining nature of the Tractatus, where Wittgenstein compares his propositions to a ladder that must be discarded after use [Wittgenstein, 1961: 6.54]. The therapeutic reading highlights Wittgenstein's intention to dissolve rather than solve philosophical problems by demonstrating that many such problems stem from misunderstandings of language.
I further discuss the implications of Wittgenstein's early philosophy for ethics, religion, and aesthetics. While the Tractatus precludes speaking meaningfully about ethical and spiritual matters, it does not deny their significance. Instead, it suggests that the most important aspects of life lie beyond the limits of language [Stroll, 2014]. Wittgenstein's reflections on death, the meaning of life, and the mystical reveal a profound commitment to the idea that the ethical cannot be captured in propositional form but must instead be shown through lived experience. This idea resonates with Kierkegaard's notion that truth is subjective and suggests that ethical and existential insights are fundamentally experiential rather than discursive [Oswalt, 2017].
A critical evaluation of these interpretations highlights their respective strengths and limitations. The positivist reading, while influential, misrepresents Wittgenstein's broader concerns by reducing his work to a verificationist thesis. The transcendental reading effectively captures the complexity of Wittgenstein's logical insights, yet struggles to reconcile his emphasis on the ineffable. Meanwhile, the therapeutic reading offers a compelling account of Wittgenstein's methodology but risks dismissing the philosophical substance of the Tractatus. Each interpretation reveals different aspects of Wittgenstein's thought, and I suggest that a comprehensive understanding of the Tractatus requires integrating insights from all three perspectives.
I conclude by reflecting on the enduring legacy of Wittgenstein's early philosophy. By drawing a clear boundary between the sayable and the unsayable, Wittgenstein redefines the scope of philosophical inquiry. His insights continue to inform debates in philosophy of language, metaphysics, and ethics. The Tractatus invites readers to recognize the limits of linguistic representation while acknowledging the profound mysteries that lie beyond them. This dual recognition of the power and limits of language remains one of Wittgenstein's most lasting contributions to philosophical thought. Moreover, Wittgenstein's acknowledgment that the most significant aspects of life cannot be articulated in language resonates with broader existential and mystical traditions. His work remains a touchstone for those seeking to understand the relationship between language, thought, and reality, and his insights continue to provoke philosophical reflection and debate.
Article Type: Literature Review |
Subject:
Philosophy of Language (Analytical)
Received: 2025/02/16 | Accepted: 2025/03/30 | Published: 2025/04/30
Received: 2025/02/16 | Accepted: 2025/03/30 | Published: 2025/04/30
References
1. Anscombe GEM (1959). An introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Kakasoltani H, translator. Tehran: GAME NU. [Persian] [Link]
2. Brommage TJ (2008). Three Wittgensteins: Interpreting the Tractatus logico philosophicus [dissertation]. Tampa: University of South Florida. [Link]
3. Bronzo S (2012). The resolute reading and its critics: An introduction to the literature. Wittgenstein-Studien. 3(1):45-80. [Link] [DOI:10.1515/wgst.2012.45]
4. Cavell S (1984). Existentialism and analytical philosophy. In: Themes out of school: Effects and causes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Link]
5. Conant J (1991). Throwing away the top of the ladder. The Yale Review. 79(3):328-364. [Link]
6. Diamond C (1991). Throwing away the ladder: How to read the tractatus. Philosophy. 63 (243):5-27. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S0031819100043102]
7. Englemann P (1967). Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein with a Memoir. Furtmüller L, translator. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. [Link]
8. Monk R (1991). Wittgenstein: The duty of genius. New York: Penguin. [Link]
9. Norman M, Wright GH (2016). Ludwig Wittgenstein; A memoir. Kakasoltani H, translator. Tehran: GAME NU. [Persian] [Link]
10. Oswalt H (2017). Wittgenstein's later philosophy. Hojjat M, translator. Tehran: Hermes. [Persian] [Link]
11. Stern D (2003). The methods of the Tractatus: Beyond positivism and metaphysics?. In: Logical empiricism: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. p. 125-156. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/j.ctvt6rjh9.12]
12. Stroll A (2014). Wittgenstein. Talaie Mahani M, translator. Tehran: HIKMAT. [Persian] [Link]
13. Wittgenstein L (1961). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Pears DF, McGuinness BF, translators. London: Routledge. [Link]
14. Wittgenstein L (1961). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Pears DF, McGuinness BF, translators. London: Routledge. [Link]
15. Wittgenstein L (2014). Logical-philosophical treatise. Dabbagh S, translator. Tehran: Hermes Publications. [Persian] [Link]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |