Volume 1, Issue 2 (2021)
jpt 2021, 1(2): 155-159 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Azimi M. Some Suggestions for the Persian Translation of Deduction/Induction/Abduction. jpt 2021; 1 (2) :155-159
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-45025-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-45025-en.html
M. Azimi *
Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , mahdiazimi@ut.ac.ir
Abstract: (2649 Views)
'Deduction', 'Induction', and 'Abduction' are among important keywords in contemporary logical and philosophical texts with high frequency, which Iranian translators have translated to “Qias/Estentaj”, “Esteqra”, and “Farzierobayi”. In this article I will show that these translations have proposed with no respect to the context and produce some difficulties. After the description of the difficulties, I will propose some solutions which are based on etymology, context, and neglected capacities of Persian language. On the basis of the solutions, these three terms will be rendered to “Forubord”, “Andarbord”, and “Farabord”.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Logic and Philosophy of Logic (Analytical)
Received: 2020/08/8 | Accepted: 2021/05/29 | Published: 2022/01/22
Received: 2020/08/8 | Accepted: 2021/05/29 | Published: 2022/01/22
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |