Volume 4, Issue 1 (2024)
jpt 2024, 4(1): 41-59 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ebrahimzadeh A, Jamshidpour A, Valeh H. Description and Evaluation of Nicholas Rescher's Critique of Extreme Specialization in Philosophy. jpt 2024; 4 (1) :41-59
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-74438-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-74438-en.html
1- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Letters and Human sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (974 Views)
Specialization and turning away from macro systematizations in philosophy can be commonly seen as relatively common practices of analytic philosophers. However, the contemporary philosopher Nicholas Rescher, as one of the exceptions to this tradition, is not only alien to this pattern but even considers it a methodological flaw. This article deals with the philosophical foundations of this point of view, the philosophical methodology derived from it, and its strategic methods by researching Rescher's works. Relying on his epistemological foundations (especially coherentism), Rescher believes that we should solve philosophical problems with a holistic approach and by considering the entire field of philosophy. Although Rescher's type of systemization is safe from some criticisms due to not neglecting the details of the system components, it still needs to be corrected or completed from a methodological perspective. One of the most important gaps in this point of view is the lack of a regulated model in managing the balance between comprehensiveness and specialization, as well as in determining the boundaries of maximality of the system.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Epistemology (Analytical)
Received: 2024/03/24 | Accepted: 2024/06/1 | Published: 2024/06/9
Received: 2024/03/24 | Accepted: 2024/06/1 | Published: 2024/06/9
References
1. Akhond Khorasani MK (1988). KEFAYAH AL-OSOL. Qom: Al Al-Bayt Institute. [Arabic] [Link]
2. Amoli MH (2009). AL-IJTIHAD VA AL-TAGHLID. Najafi Z, editor. Qom: NAVID-E ISLAM. [Arabic] [Link]
3. Ansari M (2007). FRAED AL-OSOOL (Volume 2). 8th edition. Qom: Islamic Thought Association. [Arabic] [Link]
4. Audi R (2010). Epistemology: A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge. 3rd edition. New York: Routledge. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9780203846469]
5. Berlin I (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy's view of history. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd. [Link]
6. Bonjour L (1979). Rescher's epistemological System. In: E Sosa, editor. The philosophy of Nicholas Rescher: Discussion and replies. London: Taylor & Francis. p. 157-172. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-94-009-9407-2_21]
7. Carter SM, Little M (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research. 17(10):1316-1328. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1049732307306927]
8. Chignell A (2018). The ethics of belief. Zalta EN, editor. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive (Spring 2018 Edition). [Link]
9. Dummett M (1978). Can analytical philosophy be systematic, and ought it to be?. In: Truth and other enigmas. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co Ltd. p. 437-458. [Link]
10. Ebrahimzadeh A, Valeh H, Jamshidpour A (2024). Explanation and review of Nicolas Rescher's version of coherentism. Shinakht. 16(2):11-35. [Persian] [Link]
11. Fumerton RA (2006). Epistemology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. [Link]
12. Glock HJ (2008). What is analytic philosophy?. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Link]
13. Heylighen F, Joslyn C (2015). Systems theory. In: Audi R, editor. The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 1045-1046. [Link]
14. Hobbs CA (2004). An interview with Nicholas Rescher. Kinesis. 31(2):18-45. [Link]
15. Ibna (2021). Religion and thought (the report of the joint webinar of the research vice-chancellor of the faculty of theology of Tehran University and the center for the philosophy of science of the University of Pittsburgh) [Internet]. Tehran: Ibna [cited 2024,13 April]. Available from: https://www.ibna.ir/fa/report/305007. [Persian] [Link]
16. Jackson MC (1991). Systems methodology for the management sciences. New York: Springer. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4899-2632-6]
17. Kaplan A (1998). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioural science. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. [Link]
18. Khomeini R (1997). TANGHIH AL-OSOL (Volume 2). Taghavi Eshtehardi H, editor. Tehran: Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. [Arabic] [Link]
19. Macquarrie J (1973). Existentialism. London: Pelican Books. [Link]
20. Malekian M (1993). Critical thinking lecture; The method of criticism of ideas (Volume 1). [Persian] [Link]
21. McGinn C (1993). Problems in philosophy: The limits of inquiry. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. [Link]
22. Midgley G (2001). Systemic intervention; Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Springer. [Link]
23. Naini MH (1997). FAVAED AL-OSOL (Volume 2). Kazemi Khorasani MA, editor. Qom: Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [Arabic] [Link]
24. Nietzsche FW (1998). Twilight of the idols, or how to philosophize with a hammer. Large D, editor. New York: Oxford University Press. [Link]
25. Preston A (2017). Analytic philosophy: An interpretive history. New York: Routledge. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9781315733050]
26. Rescher N (1973a). Conceptual idealism. Oxford: Blackwell. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-94-015-6746-6_13]
27. Rescher N (1973b). The coherence theory of truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Link]
28. Rescher N (1979). Cognitive systematization: A systems-theoretic approach to a coherentist theory of knowledge. Oxford: Blackwell. [Link]
29. Rescher N (1988). Rationality: A philosophical inquiry into the nature and the rationale of reason. New York: Oxford University Press. [Link]
30. Rescher N (1996). Instructive journey: An essay in autobiography. Lanham: University Press of America. [Link]
31. Rescher N (2002). Enlightening journey: The autobiography of an American scholar. Lanham: Lexington Books. [Link]
32. Rescher N (2003). Epistemology: An introduction to the theory of knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1353/book4709]
33. Rescher N (2005). Volume 1 studies in 20th century philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter. [Link] [DOI:10.1515/9783110326260]
34. Rescher N (2014). Metaphilosophy: Philosophy in philosophical perspective. Lanham: Lexington Books. [Link]
35. Rescher N (2017a). Epistemic principles: A primer for the theory of knowledge. New York: Peter Lang. [Link]
36. Rescher N (2017b). Philosophy as rational systematization. In: D'Oro G, Overgaard S, editors. The Cambridge companion to philosophical methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 32-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/9781316344118.003]
37. Rohani MS (2013). FEGHH AL-IJTIHAD VA AL-TAGHLID. Hosseini Rohani H, editor. Qom: KOLBE-YE SHOROOGH. [Arabic] [Link]
38. Russell B (1945). A history of western philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster. [Link]
39. Sadr MB (2009). MABAHETH AL-OSOL (Volume 1). Hosseini Haeri K, editor. Qom: DAR AL-BASHIR. [Arabic] [Link]
40. Schwandt TA (2007). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry. 3rd edition. California: SAGE Publications. [Link] [DOI:10.4135/9781412986281]
41. Soames S (2003). Philosophical analysis in the twentieth century. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1515/9781400825790]
42. Sosa E (2015). Rescher, Nicholas. In: Audi R, editor. The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 928. [Link]
43. Stroll A (2000). Twentieth-century analytic philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press. [Link]
44. University of Pittsburgh (2024). Nicholas Rescher, a polymath who helped to establish Pitt as a philosophy powerhouse, dies at 95 [Internet]. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh [cited 2024, 18 January]. Available from: https://www.pitt.edu/pittwire/features-articles/philosophy-professor-nicholas-rescher-obituary-2024. [Link]
45. Van Cleve J (2011). Can coherence generate warrant ex nihilo? Probability and the logic of concurring witnesses. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 82(2):337-380. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00487.x]
46. Williamson T (2007). The philosophy of philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/9780470696675]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |