Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

---

The semantics of religious language faces the question of how to understand the application of terms to God in a way that avoids both anthropomorphism and impossibility of knowing the divine. This article draws on Michael Lynch’s distinction between minimal and robust concepts and offers two possible solutions to this problem: (1) linguistic usage in the human context is based on minimal concepts, while usage in the divine context is based on robust concepts; (2) in both contexts, usage is grounded in robust concepts, but the divine usage is characterized by a higher degree of robustness. The article proceeds to critically assess these solutions and argues that, although the distinction between minimal and robust concepts helps to explain the difference between human and divine usage of language, it still encounters fundamental difficulties in specifying the metaphysical implications of the concepts ascribed to God.

Keywords: Religious Language, Metaphysical Pluralism, Michael Lynch, Relativistic Kantianism, Minimal Concept, Robust Concept

     

* Corresponding Author Address: Faculty of Philosophy, University of Religions, Imam Sadiq Street, Pardisan, Qom, Iran. Postal Code: 3749113357

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

---

---