Some Remarks on Teaching Logic in Higher Education Institutions

Document Type : Original Research

Author
M.M. Haeri
Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
10.58209/jpt.1.2.101
Abstract
In different branches of science, the word 'logic' can denote different scientific activities. Logic courses taught in humanities departments and the ones taught in engineering departments only share similar course titles, several preliminary definitions, and examples. This raises the question about the nature of logic and the purpose for teaching it to students of different academic majors in higher education institutions. Normally, the answer would be that logic, similar to other courses, equips students with tools or skills they will need in their studies. But what are these tools and skills, and what is the best method for teaching them to students of different academic majors? This article aims to answer this question by examining the three major options: Aristotelian logic, first-order predicate classical logic, and informal logic. I try to demonstrate philosophical and psychological reasons in favor of teaching informal logic as the main material in introductory courses in logic, specifically introductory courses aimed at students who do not major in logic.

Keywords

Subjects

Aldisert, R. J., 2012. Logic for Lawyers: A Guide to Clear Legal Thinking. 3rd ed. Boulder, Colorado:National Institute for Trial Advocacy.
Aristotle, n.d. Prior Analytics, Book I, Part II. [Online]
Available at: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/prior.1.i.html
[Accessed 20 9 2020].
Attridge, N., Aberdein, A. & Inglis, M., 2016. Does studying logic improve logical reasoning?. In: Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Szeged, Hungary: IGPME.
Avicennā, 2012. Ishārāt Va Tanbihāt - Vol. 2: Logic (Translation & Commentary by Hassan Malekshāhi). Tehran: Soroush Press [Persian].
Burgess, J. P., 2009. Philosophical Logic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Byerly, T. R., 2019. Teaching for Intellectual Virtue in Logic and Critical Thinking Classes: Why and How. Teaching Philosophy, 42(1).
Carrascal, B., 2011. Teaching Logic in Philosophy. In: P. Blackburn, H. Van Ditmarsch, M. Manzano & F. Soler-Toscano, eds. Tools for Teaching Logic. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 38-45.
Feferman, S., 1989. The Number Systems: Foundations of Algebra and Analysis. New York: Chelsea Pub..
Geach, P. T., 1979. On Teaching Logic. Philosophy, 54(207), pp. 5-17.
Johnson, R., 2014. The Rise of Informal Logic: Essays on Argumentation, Critical Thinking, Reasoning and Politics. Digital ed. Windsor: University of Windsor.
Kadivar, P., 2015. Psychology of Learning. 2nd ed. Tehran: SAMT [Persian].
Kamina, P. & Iyer, N. R., 2009. From Concrete to Abstract: Teaching for Transfer of Learning when Using Manipulatives. In: NERA Conference Proceedings. Connecticut: NERA.
Kreeft, P., 2014. Socratic Logic. 3.1 ed. South Bend, Indiana: St. Augustine's Press.
Lemmon, E. J., 1965. Beginning Logic. Hong Kong: Thomas Nelson.
Levi, D. S., 2000. In Defense of Informal Logic. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Kulwer Academic Publishers.
Maker, W., 1983. Teaching Informal Logic as an Emancipatory Activity. Informal Logic, 5(1), pp. 17-19.
Markovits, H., Thompson, A., V. & Brisson, J., 2015. Metacognition and Abstract Reasoning. Memory & Cognition, Volume 43, pp. 681-693.
Myers, A., 2016. A Stanford computer scientist designs a logic curriculum for high school. [Online]
Available at: https://engineering.stanford.edu/magazineAndrew%20Myers/article/stanford-computer-scientist-designs-logic-curriculum-high-school
Nassen, R., n.d. Logic for Lawyers: A Cheat Sheet. [Online]
Available at: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/government_public/resources/logic_for_lawyers/
Priest, G., 2006. Doubt Truth to Be A Liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rearden, M., 1982. On Teaching Students Logic. Philosophy, 57(219), pp. 130-132.
Robinson, S. R., 2011. Teaching logic and teaching critical thinking: revisiting McPeck. Higher Education Research &, 30(3), pp. 275-287.
Vincelette, A. & Daurio, J., 2019. St. John’s Seminary - Logic Course Syllabus. [Online]
Available at: https://www.scienceforseminaries.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Logic.pdf
Philosophical Thought
Volume 1, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
Spring 2021
Spring 2021
Pages 101-117

  • Receive Date 04 December 2020
  • Accept Date 29 May 2021
  • Publish Date 19 February 2023