Some Remarks on Teaching Logic in Higher Education Institutions

Haeri, M.M.

doi:10.58209/jpt.1.2.101

Some Remarks on Teaching Logic in Higher Education Institutions

Document Type : Original Research

Author

M.M. Haeri

Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.1.2.101

Abstract

In different branches of science, the word 'logic' can denote different scientific activities. Logic courses taught in humanities departments and the ones taught in engineering departments only share similar course titles, several preliminary definitions, and examples. This raises the question about the nature of logic and the purpose for teaching it to students of different academic majors in higher education institutions. Normally, the answer would be that logic, similar to other courses, equips students with tools or skills they will need in their studies. But what are these tools and skills, and what is the best method for teaching them to students of different academic majors? This article aims to answer this question by examining the three major options: Aristotelian logic, first-order predicate classical logic, and informal logic. I try to demonstrate philosophical and psychological reasons in favor of teaching informal logic as the main material in introductory courses in logic, specifically introductory courses aimed at students who do not major in logic.

Keywords

Teaching Logic

Critical Thinking

Learning Logic

Informal Logic

Subjects

Logic and Philosophy of Logic (Analytical)

- Aldisert RJ (2012). Logic for lawyers: a guide to clear legal thinking. 3rd Editon. Colorado: National Institute for Trial Advocacy.
- Aristotle (2020). Prior Analytics (Book I: Part 2) [Internet]. Unknown city: The Internet Classics Archive. [Cited 2020 Sep 9]. Available from: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/prior.1.i.html
- Attridge N, Aberdein A, Inglis M (2016). Does studying logic improve logical reasoning?. Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Szeged, Hungary, 3-7 August 2016. IGPME.
- Malekshahi H (2012). Avicenna Isharat va Tanbihat. Tehran: Soroush Press. [Persian]
- Burgess JP (2009). Philosophical logic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Byerly TR (2019). Teaching for intellectual virtue in logic and critical thinking classes: why and how. Teaching Philosophy. 42(1).
- Carrascal B (2011). Teaching logic in philosophy. In: Blackburn P, Van DitmarschH, Manzano M, Soler-Toscano F, editors. Tools for teaching logic. Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 38-45.
- Feferman S (1989). The number systems: foundations of algebra and analysis. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company.
- Geach PT (1979). On teaching logic. Philosophy. 54(207):5-17.
- Johnson RH (2014). The rise of informal logic: essays on argumentation, critical thinking, reasoning and politics. Windsor: University of Windsor.
- Kadivar P (2015). Psychology of learning. 2nd Edition. Tehran: SAMT. [Persian]
- Kamina P, Iyer NR (2009). From concrete to abstract: teaching for transfer of learning when using manipulatives. NERA Conference Proceedings 2009.
- Kreeft P (2010). Socratic logic: a logic text using Socratic Method, platonic questions & Aristotelian principles. Indiana: St. Augustine's Press.
- Lemmon EJ (1965). Beginning logic. Hong Kong: Nelson.
- Levi DS (2000). In defense of informal logic. 1st Edition. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Maker W (1983). Teaching informal logic as an emancipatory activity. Informal Logic. 5(1):17-19.
- Markovits H, Thompson A, Brisson VJ (2015). Metacognition and Abstract Reasoning. Memory & Cognition. 43:681-693.
- Myers A (2016). A Stanford computer scientist designs a logic curriculum for high school [Internet]. Stanford: Stanford Engineering. [Cited 2020 Sep 7] Available from: https://engineering.stanford.edu/magazine/article/stanford-computer-scientist-designs-logiccurriculum-high-school
- Nassen R (Unknown). Logic for lawyers: a cheat sheet [Internet]. Washington, DC: ABA. [Cited 2020 Sep 9]. Available from: https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/government_public/logicfor-lawyers-a-cheat-sheet.pdf
- Priest G (2006). Doubt truth to be a liar. Unknown city: Clarendon Press.
- Rearden M (1982). On teaching students logic. Philosophy. 57(219):130-132.
- Robinson SR (2011). Teaching logic and teaching critical thinking: revisiting McPeck. Higher Education Research & Development. 30(3):275-287.
- Vincelette A, Daurio J (2019). St. John’s Seminary-logic course syllabus [Internet]. Unknown city: AAAS. [Cited 2020 Sep 9]. Available from: https://www.scienceforseminaries.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/06/Logic.pdf