Philosophical Thought

A critique on the belief of "Wonder: the beginning of philosophy" and arguing for "Surprise: the origin of abductive inference"

Document Type : Original Research

Author

M. Zaker

Department of Mathematics, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.58209/jpt.1.3.249
Abstract
The article’s main aim is to investigate the relationship between wonder and philosophical thoughts and between surprise and abductive thoughts. We critique the Platonic belief that philosophy begins from wonder and argue that the explanatory and normalizing function of knowledge in societies and naturalistic ontology neutralizes the astonishment and makes ineffective its impact on philosophical thoughts. In contrast, we argue that the genesis of philosophical thought is due to deep speculation and introspective temperament of the mind and skeptical exploration of the existing knowledge and beliefs. Abduction has been the recent research subject of various disciplines. Next, the paper is devoted to a new investigation of abductive inference, subjective abduction, and its relationship with the emotion of surprise and dramatic events. We explain this amazing mental ability regarding subjective estimation of probability and intuitive expectation. At last, some fallacies arising from abductive reasoning are discussed.

Keywords

Wonder
Normalizing Knowledge
Surprise
Abductive Inference
Intuitive Expectation
Abductive Fallacies
Subjects
- Bluck RS, editors (2011). Plato's Meno. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bollert DW (2010). The wonder of humanity in Plato’s dialogues. Kritike. 4(1):174-198.
- Cassirer, E (1955). The philosophy of symbolic forms: Volume 2: Mythical thoughs. New Haven: Yale Univeristy Press.
- Chajewska U, Halpern JY (1997). Defining explanation in probabilistic systems. UAI'97: Proceedings of the Thirteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. pp. 62-71.
- Deckard MF, Losonczi P, editors (2010). Philosophy begins in wonder: an introduction to early modern philosophy, theology, and science. Pickwick Publications.
- Descartes R (1954). Rules for the direction of the mind. Anscombe E, Geach PT, translators. Nelson Open University.
- Descartes R (1989). Passions of the soul. Voss SH, translator. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.
- Fisher P (1998). Wonder, the rainbow, and the aesthetics of rare experiences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Glass DH (2021). Competing hypotheses and abductive inference. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 89(252):161-178.
- Josephson JR, Josephson SG, editors (1996). Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kakas AC, Kowalski RA, Toni F (1992). Abductive logic programming. Journal of Logic and Computation. 2(6):719-770.
- Lipton P (2004) Inference to the best explanation. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
- Lombrozo T (2012). Explanation and abductive inference: The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Meyer SB, Lunnay, B (2013). The application of abductive and retroductive inference for the design and analysis of theory-driven sociological research. Sociological Research Online. 18(1):86-96.
- Hartshorn C, Weiss P, Burks AW editors. (1931). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Plato's Theaetetus (1986). Part I of the being of the beautiful. Seth Benardete, translator. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Poole D (1993). Probabilistic Horn abduction and Bayesian networks. Artificial Intelligence. 64(1):81-129.
- Sachs J, translator (2002). Aristotle's metaphysics. New Mexico: Green Lion Press.
- Sternberg RJ, Sternberg K, Mio J (2012). Cognitive psychology. Cengage Learning Press.
Philosophical Thought
Volume 1, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
Summer 2021
Summer 2021
Pages 249-263

  • Receive Date 23 November 2021
  • Accept Date 27 December 2021
  • Publish Date 22 January 2022