- Alonso FM (2018). Reductive views of shared intention. In: Jankovic M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 34-44.
- Andric V (2014). Can groups be autonomous rational agents? A challenge to the List-Pettit Theory. In: Konzelmann Ziv A, Schmid HB, editors. Institutions, emotions, and group agents. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 343-353.
- Bhaduri S (2013). The Yayati complex: A contra-oedipal take on myth and the unconscious. In: Burnett L, Bahun S, Main R, editors. Myth, literature, and unconscious. London: Routledge. p. 39-58.
- Bouchard G (2017). Social myths and collective imaginaries. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- Bratman ME (2014). Acting over time, acting together. In: Konzelmann Ziv A, Schmid HB, editors. Institutions, emotions, and group agents. Cham: Springer. p. 247-261.
- Brigido RES (2014). Groups, normativity, and disagreement. In: Konzelmann Ziv A, Schmid HB, editors. Institutions, emotions, and group agents. Cham: Springer. p. 81-98.
- Buekens F (2014). Searlean reflections on sacred mountains. In: Konzelmann Ziv A, Schmid HB, editors. Institutions, emotions, and group agents. Cham: Springer. p. 33-52.
- Cantz P (2013). The slaughter of Isaac: Oedipal themes in the akedah narrative revisited. In: Burnett L, Bahun S, Main R, editors. Myth, literature, and unconscious. London: Routledge. p. 59-80.
- Clarke S (1981). The foundations of structuralism: A critique of Levi-Strauss and the structuralist movement. Brighton: The Harvester Press.
- Condello A (2019). Introduction. In: Money, social ontology and law. London: Routledge. p. 1-6.
- De Sousa R (2014). Emergence and empathy. In: Konzelmann Ziv A, Schmid HB, editors. Institutions, emotions, and group agents. Cham: Springer. p. 141-158.
- De Vecchi F (2014). Three types of heterotropic intentionality. A Taxonomy in social ontology. In: Konzelmann Ziv A, Schmid HB, editors. Institutions, emotions, and group agents. Cham: Springer. p. 117-137.
- Doty WG (2000). Mythography: The study of myths and rituals. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
- Doty WG (2002). Myth and postmodernist philosophy. In: Thinking trough myths. London: Routledge. p. 142-157.
- Ellwood R (1999). The politics of myth. New York: State University of New York Press.
- Epstein B (2014). Social objects without intentions. In: Konzelmann Ziv A, Schmid HB, editors. Institutions, emotions, and group agents. Cham: Springer. p. 53-68.
- Galvani M (2018). The role of the intellectual in the social organism: Edith Stein’s analysis between social ontology and philosophical anthropology. In: Luft S, Hagengruber R, editors. Women phenomenologists on social ontology. Cham: Springer. p. 75-84.
- Gilbert M (2007). Searle and collective intentions. In: Intentional acts and institutional facts. Cham: Springer. p. 31-48.
- Gilbert M (2011). Mutual recognition and some related phenomena. In: Joint commitment. Berlin: De Gruyter. p. 271-286.
- Gilbert M (2018). Joint Commitment. In: Jankovic M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 130-139.
- Guerrero H (2014). Feeling of being-together and caring-with. In: Konzelmann Ziv A, Schmid HB, editors. Institutions, emotions, and group agents. Cham: Springer. p. 177-193.
- Guerrero H (2016). Feeling together and caring with one another. Cham: Springer.
- Hatab LJ (1990). Myth and philosophy. Chicago: Open Court.
- Hindriks F (2017). Group agents and social institutions: Beyond Tuomela’s social ontology. In: Preyer G, Peter G. Social ontology and collective intentionality. Cham: Springer. p. 197-210.
- Hindriks F (2018). Institutions and collective intentionality. In: Jankovic M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 353-362.
- Hudin J (2014). The logical form of totalitarianism. In: Konzelmann Ziv A, Schmid HB, editors. Institutions, emotions, and group agents. Cham: Springer. p. 69-79.
- Huebner B (2014). Macrocognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Huebner B, Hedahl M (2018). Shared values, interests and desires. In: Jankovic M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 104-114.
- Ikaheimo H, Laitinen A (2011). Recognition and social ontology: An introduction. In: Recognition and social ontology. Leiden: Brill. p. 1-21.
- Jankovic M, Ludwig K (2018). Introductions. In: The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 1-6.
- Konzelmann Ziv A, Schmid HB (2014). Introduction. In: Institutions, emotions, and group agents. Cham: Springer. p. 1-15.
- Lackey J (2018). Collective epistemology. In: Jankovic M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 196-208.
- Laitinen A (2011). Recognition, acknowledgement, and acceptance. In: Ikaheimo H, Laitinen A, editors. Recognition and social ontology. Leiden: Brill. p. 309-347.
- Laitinen A (2017). We-mode collective intentionality and its place in social reality. In: Preyer G, Peter G, editors. Social ontology and collective intentionality. Cham: Springer. p. 147-167.
- Ludwig K (2007). Foundations of social reality in collective intentional behavior. In: Intentional acts and institutional facts. Cham: Springer. p. 49-71.
- Ludwig K (2014). The ontology of collective action. In: Preyer G, Hindriks F, Chant SR, editors. From individual to collective intentionality. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 112-133.
- Ludwig K (2018a). Proxy agency in collective action. In: Jankovic M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 58-67.
- Ludwig K (2018b). Actions and events in plural discourse. In: Jankovic M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 476-488.
- Ludwig K (2020). The social construction of legal norms. In: Garcia-Godinez M, Mellin R, Tuomela R, editors. Social ontology, normativity and law. Berlin: De Gruyter. p. 179-208.
- Machery E (2014). Social ontology and the objection from reification. In: Perspectives on social ontology and social cognition. Cham: Springer. p. 87-100.
- Makela P, Hakli R (2020). Identity of corporations: Against the shareholder view. In: Social ontology, normativity and law. Berlin: De Gruyter. p. 209-220.
- Merkur D (2004). Psychoanalytic approaches to myth. London: Routledge.
- Michaelian K, Sutton J (2018). Collective memory. In: Jankovic M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 140-151.
- Miller K, Tuomela R (2014). Collective goals analyzed. In: From individual to collective intentionality. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 34-60.
- Miller S (2007). Joint action: The individual strikes back. In: Tsohatzidis SL, editor. Intentional acts and institutional facts. Cham: Springer. p. 73-92.
- Moussa M (2007). Deducing natural necessity from purposive activity: The scientific realist logic of Habermas’ theory of communicative action and Luhmann’s systems theory. In: Contributions to social ontology. London: Routledge. p. 89-101.
- Nida-Rumelin J (2014). Structural rationality and collective intentions. In: From individual to collective intentionality. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 207-222.
- Paternotte C (2014). Constraints on joint action. In: Perspectives on social ontology and social cognition. Cham: Springer. p. 103-124.
- Pettit P (2018). Corporate agency: The lesson of the discursive dilemma. In: The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 249-259.
- Roth AS (2014). Indispensability, the discursive dilemma, and groups with minds of their own. In: From individual to collective intentionality. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 137-162.
- Salmela M (2014). The functions of collective emotions in social groups. In: Konzelmann Ziv A, Schmid HB, editors. Institutions, emotions, and group agents. Cham: Springer. p. 159-176.
- Sanchez-Cuenca I (2007). A behavioural critique of Searle’s theory of institutions. In: Intentional acts and institutional facts. Cham: Springer. p. 175-189.
- Scarborough M (2002). Myth and phenomenology. In: Thinking trough myths. London: Routledge. p. 46-64.
- Schmid HB (2017). What kind of mode is the we-mode?. In: Social ontology and collective intentionality. Cham: Springer. p. 79-93.
- Schmid HB, Wu X (2018). We-experience-With Walther. In: Luft S, Hagengruber R, editors. Women phenomenologists on social ontology. Cham: Springer. p. 105-117.
- Schmitz M (2017). What is a mode account of collective intentionality?. In: Preyer G, Peter G, editors. Social ontology and collective intentionality. Cham: Springer. p. 37-70.
- Schmitz M (2020). Of layers and lawyers. In: Garcia-Godinez M, Mellin R, Tuomela R, editors. Social ontology, normativity and law. Berlin: De Gruyter. p. 221-240.
- Searle JR (2007). Social ontology: The problem and steps toward a solution. In: Tsohatzidis SL, editor. Intentional acts and institutional facts. Cham: Springer. p. 11-28.
- Searle JR (2014). A conversation with John Searle. In: Gallotti M, Michael J, editors. Perspectives on social ontology and social cognition. Cham: Springer. p. 22-26.
- Searle JR (2018). Status functions. In: Jankovic M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 300-309.
- Seddone G (2014). Collective intentionality, norms and institutions. Lausanne: Peter Lang.
- Segal RA (2004). Myth: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Segal RA (2013). Freudian and Jungian approaches to myth: The similarities. In: Burnett L, Bahun S, Main R, editors. Myth, literature, and unconscious. London: Routledge. p. 101-119.
- Sheehy P (2018). Social groups. In: Jankovic M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 277-289.
- Smith DW, McIntyre R (1982). Husserl and intentionality: A study of mind, meaning and language. Cham: Springer.
- Spitzer AN (2011). Derrida, Myth and the impossibility of philosophy. London: Continuum.
- Stahl T (2011). Institutional power, collective acceptance, and recognition. In: Recognition and social ontology. Leiden: Brill. p. 349-372.
- Tollefsen D (2014). A dynamic theory of shared intention and the phenomenology of joint action. In: From individual to collective intentionality. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 12-33.
- Tsohatzidis SL (2007). Introduction. In: Intentional acts and institutional facts: Essays on John Searle’s social ontology. Cham: Springer. p. 1-10.
- Tuomela R (2013). Social ontology. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Tuomela R (2017). Response to Arto Laitinen. In: Preyer G, Peter G, editors. Social ontology and collective intentionality. Cham: Springer. p. 169-178.
- Tuomela R (2018). Non-reductive views of shared intention. In: Jankovic M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge. p. 25-33.
- Tuomela R (2020). We-thinking, we-mode, and group agents. In: Social ontology, normativity and law. Berlin: De Gruyter. p. 11-26.
- Voela A (2013). From Oedipus to Ahab (and back): Myth and psychoanalysis in science fiction. In: Burnett L, Bahun S, Main R, editors. Myth, literature, and unconscious. London: Routledge. p. 81-100.
- Zahle J (2020). The level conception of the methodological individualism-holism debate. In: Social ontology, normativity and law. Berlin: De Gruyter. p. 27-38.
- Zaibert L, Smith B (2007). The varieties of normativity: An essay on social ontology. In: Tsohatzidis SL, editor. Intentional acts and institutional facts: Essays on John Searle’s social ontology. Cham: Springer. p. 157-173.
