- Arenhart JRB, Bueno O (2015). Structural realism and the nature of structure. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 5:111-139.
- Bain J (2013). Category-theoretic structure and radical ontic structural realism. Synthese. 190:1621-1635.
- Dasgupta S (2009). Individuals: An essay in revisionary metaphysics. Philosophical Studies. 145(1):35-67.
- Dewar N (2019). Algebraic structuralism. Philosophical Studies. 176(7):1831-1854.
- Dewar N (2022). Structure and equivalence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Halvorson H (2019). The logic in philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Heller M (2016). Category free category theory and its philosophical implications. Logic and Logical Philosophy. 25(4):447-459.
- Ladyman J (2023). Structural realism. Zalta EN, Nodelman U, editors. Stanford: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 edition).
- Ladyman J, Ross D, Spurrett D, Collier J (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics Naturalised. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lal R, Teh N (2017). Categorical generalization and physical structuralism: Figure 1. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 68(1).
- Lam V, Wüthrich C (2015). No categorial support for radical ontic structural realism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 66(3):605-634.
- Menzel C (2016). Possible worlds. Zalta EN, Nodelman U, editors. Stanford: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2025 edition).
- Reck E, Schiemer G (2025). Structuralism in the philosophy of mathematics. Zalta EN, Nodelman U, editors. Stanford: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2025 edition).
- Schaffer J (2010). Monism: The priority of the whole. Philosophical Review. 119(1):31-76.
- Sider T (2008). Monism and statespace structure. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements. 62:129-150.
- Spivak DI (2017). Categories as mathematical models. In: Categories for the working philosopher. Landry E, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 381-401.
- Vahidnia M, Mesgari AA (2022). Ontic structural realism and van Fraassen’s criticism. Journal of Recognition. 14(2):223-252. [Persian]