Volume 2, Issue 2 (2022)
jpt 2022, 2(2): 81-103 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Soleimani N, Hesamifar A, Fath Taheri F, Peek Herfe S. Analyzing and Examining the Epistemological Foundations of Ethics in Richard Rorty's Philosophy. jpt 2022; 2 (2) :81-103
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-58234-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-34-58234-en.html
1- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran , n.soleimani2015@gmail.com
2- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
2- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
Abstract: (1108 Views)
Criticizing the history of philosophy and epistemology definitely requires great courage, because the effects and consequences of this can lead to dangerous results. When we ignore any metaphysical and superhuman beings and generally explain any epistemological issues in the explanation of our knowledge strategy, then the result can lead to nihilism, absurdism, disorder and anarchism. It can be dangerous and toxic both for the individual and for the society. While we expect to encounter such nihilistic thought in Rorty's thought, on the contrary, the philosopher in question claims that his thought will not be led to what was mentioned. Rather, it seeks pleasure, happiness and happiness for humans, because although there is no longer talk of truth and goodness, but by expanding the solidarity between human "us" as much as possible, it seeks to change this road and move towards a human utopia. Our purpose of writing this article is to investigate and analyze the position of the epistemological foundations of ethics in Rorty's thought.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Philosophy of Ethics (Analytical)
Received: 2021/12/28 | Accepted: 2022/04/30 | Published: 2022/11/1
Received: 2021/12/28 | Accepted: 2022/04/30 | Published: 2022/11/1
References
1. Asghari M (2019). The priority of literature to philosophy in Richard Rorty. Journal of Philosophical Investigations.13(28):207-219. [Persian] [Link]
2. Audi R (1991). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link]
3. Cahoone LE (2002). From Modernism to post-modernism. Group of Translators, translators. Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. [Link]
4. Caputo JD (1999). Perspectives in continental philosophy series. New York: Fordham University Press. [Link]
5. Critchley S, Derrida J, Laclau E, Rorty R, Mouffe C (1996). Deconstruction and pragmatism. London: Routledge. [Link]
6. Derong P, Liangjian L (2005). Contingency and the philosophy of Richard Rorty. Journal of Chinese Philosophy. 32(4):633-640. [Link] [DOI:10.1163/15406253-03204006]
7. Diprose R, Ferrell R, editors (1991). Cartographies: poststructuralism and the mapping of bodies and spaces. Sydney: Allen & Unwin. pp. 3-12. [Link]
8. Dombrowski DA (2007). Rorty versus Hartshorne, or, poetry versus metaphysics. Metaphilosophy. 38(1):88-110. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00467.x]
9. Fischer A, Fuchs Marko J (2014). Solidarity at the time of the fall': Adorno and Rorty on Moral Realism. Ethics & Politics. 2:550-559. [Link]
10. Forster PD (1998). Pragmatism, relativism and the critique of philosophy. Metaphilosophy. 29(2):58-78. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/1467-9973.00080]
11. Gibson A (1999). Postmodernity, ethics and the novel from Leavis to Levinas. London: Routledge. [Link]
12. Guignon C, Hilley DR (2003). Richard Rorty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511613951]
13. Huang Y (2010). Rorty, pragmatism, and confucianism: With responses by Richard Rorty (SUNY series in Chinese Philosophy and Culture). New York: State University of New York Press. [Link]
14. Hutchinson AC (1989). The Three 'Rs': Reading/Rorty/Radically. Harvard Law Review. 103(2):555-585. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/1341275]
15. James T (2007). Routledge philosophy guidebook to Rorty and the mirror of nature. London: Routledge. [Link]
16. James W (1956). The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy, and human immortality. New York: Dover Publications. [Link]
17. Kokab S (2007). Pragmatism, relativism, and opposition to rationalism: translation of Richard Rorty paper. Ketab Mahe Falsafe. 6:69-82. [Persian] [Link]
18. Kwiek M (2003). Agents, spectators, and social hope Richard Rorty and American intellectuals. Journal of Social and Political Theory. (101):25-49. [Link] [DOI:10.3167/004058103782267485]
19. Langsdorf L, Smith AR (1995). Recovering pragmatism's voice: The classical tradition, Rorty, and the philosophy of communication. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 31(4):931-936. [Link]
20. Lawler PA (1997). Democratic therapy and the end of community. The Intercollegiate Review. 32(2):27 [Link]
21. Leiter B (2007). Science and morality: Pragmatic reflection on Rorty's pragmatism. University of Chicago Law Review. 74:929. [Link]
22. Malone JC (2004). Pragmatism and radical behaviorism: A response to Leigland. Behavior and Philosophy. 32(2).313-315. [Link]
23. McCumber J (1990). Review: reconnecting Rorty: The situation of discourse in Richard Rorty's contingency, irony, and solidarity. Diacritics. 20(2):2-19. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/465321]
24. McDermid D (2006). The varieties of pragmatism. Now York: Continuum International Publishing. [Link]
25. Miller A (1998). Philosophy of language. Montreal: McGill Press. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9780203227701]
26. Noori M (2016). Criticism of collectivism on liberalism and its evaluation from Richard Rorty's point of view. Philosophical Research. 10(19):409-444. [Persian] [Link]
27. Perry MJ (1997). Are human rights universal?: The relativist challenge and related matters. Human Rights Quarterly. 19(3):461-509. [Link] [DOI:10.1353/hrq.1997.0022]
28. Richard R (2001). The decline of redemptive truth and the rise of a literary culture: the way the western intellectuals went. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Studia Europaea. 46(1):19-36. [Link]
29. Rorty R (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [Link]
30. Rorty R (1990). Objectivity, relativism and truth: Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139173643]
31. Rorty R (1991). Essays on Heidegger and others: Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511609039]
32. Rorty R (1998). Truth and progress: Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511625404]
33. Rorty R (2000). Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin Books. [Link]
34. Rorty R (2005). Philosophy and social hope. Azarang A, Naderi N, translators. Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. [Persian] [Link]
35. Rorty R (2006). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Yazdanjoo P, translator. Tehran: Nashr-e Markaz. [Persian] [Link]
36. Rorty R (2007). A rejoinder to Béla Egyed. Bratislava: Kritika & Kontext. [Link]
37. Seglow J (1996). Richard Rortv and the problem of the person. Politics. 16(1):39-45. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9256.1996.tb00145.x]
38. Shook JR, Ghiraldelli P (2007). Contemporary pragmatism (Volume 4). Amsterdam: Rodopi. [Link]
39. Sweet W (1996). Human rights as a foundation of solidarity: The contribution of Jacques Maritain. Available from: https://nanopdf.com/download/human-rights-as-a-foundation-of-solidarity_pdf [Link]
40. Tajik MR (2007). Divine details in Rorty's thought. Ketab Mahe Falsafe. 6:23-34. [Persian] [Link]
41. Turner SP, Roth PA (2003). The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of the social sciences. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/9780470756485]
42. Voparil C (2011a). Rortyan cultural politics and the problem of speaking for others. Contemporary Pragmatism. 8(1):115-131. [Link] [DOI:10.1163/18758185-90000186]
43. Voparil CJ (2011b). Reading Rorty politically. Cincinnati: Humanities & Society, :union: Institute & University. [Link]
44. Waller BN (2003). The sad truth: Optimism, pessimism, and pragmatism. Ratio. 16(2):189-197. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/1467-9329.00215]
45. Ward I (2008). Bricolage and low cunning: Rorty on pragmatism, politics and poetic justice. Legal Studies. 28(2):281-305. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2008.00088.x]
46. Wellen R (2001). The politics of intellectual integrity. Max Weber Studies. 2(1):81-101. [Link]
47. Wilshire B (2000). The primal roots of American philosophy: pragmatism, phenomenology, and native American thought. Philadelphia: Penn State University Press. [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |