- Alston WP (1988). The deontological conception of epistemic justification. Philosophical Perspectives. 2:257-299.
- Alston WP (2005). Beyond “justification”: Dimensions of epistemic evaluation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Ammerman R, Singer M (1970). Belief, knowledge, and truth: Readings in the theory of knowledge. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
- Audi R (2015). Reasons, rights, and values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Code L (2017). Epistemic responsibility. In: Kidd IJ, Medina J, Pohlhaus G, editors. The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice. London: Routledge.
- Dearden RF, Hirst PH, Peters RS (2010). Education and the development of reason. London: Routledge.
- Feldman R (2000). The ethics of belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 60(3):667-695.
- Ginet C (2001). Deciding to believe. In: Steup M, editor. Knowledge, truth, and duty: Essays on epistemic justification, responsibility, and virtue. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 63-76.
- Heil J (1983). Doxastic agency. Philosophical Studies. 43(3):355-364.
- Heil J (1984). Doxastic incontinence. Mind. 93(369):56-70.
- Heil J (1992). Believing reasonably. Noûs. 26(1):47-61.
- Heller M (2000). Hobartian voluntarism: Grounding a deontological conception of epistemic justification. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 81(2):130-141.
- Huss B (2009). Three challenges (and three replies) to the ethics of belief. Synthese. 168(2):249-271.
- James W (1915). The will to believe, and other essays in popular philosophy. New York: Longmans Green & Co.
- James W (1920). The letters of William James. Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press.
- Naylor MB (1985). Voluntary belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 45(3):427-436.
- Nickel PJ (2010). Voluntary belief on a reasonable basis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 81(2):312-334.
- Nottelmann N (2007). Blameworthy belief: A study in epistemic deontologism. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Peels R (2017). Responsible belief: A theory in ethics and epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Plantinga A (1993). Warrant: The current debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Pojman LP (2000). What can we know?: An introduction to the theory of knowledge. Boston: Cengage Learning.
- Price HH (1954). Belief and will. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 28(1):1-26.
- Robitzsch A (2019). An externalist approach to epistemic responsibility: Intellectual norms and their application to epistemic peer disagreement. Cham: Springer.
- Ryan Sh (2003). Doxastic compatibilism and the ethics of belief. Philosophical Studies. 114(1-2):47-79.
- Steup M (2012). Belief control and intentionality. Synthese. 188(2):145-163.
- Vitz R (2008). Doxastic voluntarism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Zagzebski L (1996). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Zagzebski L (2001). Must knowers be agents?. In: Fairweather A, Zagzebski L, editors. Virtue epistemology: Essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 142-157.
