- Broome J (2000). Normative requirements. In: Dancy J, editor. Normativity. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Dutilh Novaes C (2015). A dialogical, multi-agent account of the normativity of logic. Dialectica. 69(4):587-609.
- Evershed J (2021). Another way logic might be normative. Synthese. 199(3):5861-5881.
- Field H (2009a). What is the normative role of logic?. The Aristotelian Society. 83(1):251-268.
- Field H (2009b). Pluralism in logic. Review of Symbolic Logic. 2(2):342-359.
- Field H (2015). What is logical validity?. In: Colin R, Caret C, Hjortland O, editors. Foundations of logical consequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Frege G (1956). The thought: A logical inquiry. Mind. 65(259):289-311.
- Frege G (1979). A brief survey of my logical doctrines. In: Hermes H, Kambartel F, Kaulbach F, editors & translators. Posthumous writings. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Harman G (1984). Logic and reasoning. In: Foundations: Logic, language, and mathematics. Cham: Springer. p. 107-127.
- Harman G (1986). Change in view: Principles of reasoning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Kalantari SA (2018). A study of the normativity of logic thesis on the basis of Harman's criticisms and proposing an explanation for the thesis. Philosophy of Science. 8(16):65-84. [Persian]
- MacFarlane J (2002). Frege, Kant, and the logic in logicism. The Philosophical Review. 111(1):25-65.
- MacFarlane J (2004). In what sense (if any) is logic normative for thought. Chicago: Central Division APA.
- Panahi S, Kalantari SA, Karbasizadeh A (2026). An analysis of the normativity of logic with reference to John MacFarlane’s account. Wisdom And Philosophy. 21(84):155-186. [Persian]
- Russell G (2020). Logic isn’t normative. Inquiry. 63(3-4):371-388.
- Steinberger F (2017a). Frege and Carnap on the normativity of logic. Synthese. 194(1):143-162.
- Steinberger F (2017b). The normative status of logic. Stanford: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Steinberger F (2019). Three ways in which logic might be normative. Journal of Philosophy. 116(1):5-31.
